爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements
爆料网AT affirmed the 爆料网DT order denying revision. 爆料网AT held that a change in law is not a “fact” contemplated by Article 12. 1 of the 爆料网DT Statute. 爆料网AT held that the issuance of new jurisprudence by 爆料网AT is an issue of law, not of fact.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
爆料网DT Order: The Secretary-General submitted an application with 爆料网DT for revision of its judgment, under Article 29 of the 爆料网DT RoP. The Secretary-General considered the new decision of 爆料网AT to fix the interest rate applicable to pre-judgment compensation at the US prime rate to be a “decisive fact” which was unknown at the time of the 爆料网DT judgment. The Secretary-General maintained that 爆料网DT’s award of eight per cent rate on the pre-judgment compensation was contrary to the new jurisprudence of 爆料网AT and, should, therefore be revised. 爆料网DT rejected the application for revision, holding that the issuance of new jurisprudence by 爆料网AT did not constitute a new fact.
Legal Principle(s)
The issuance of new jurisprudence by 爆料网AT is an issue of law and does not constitute a new fact.