爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements
爆料网AT noted that the parties freely made an agreement, the Appellant received benefits under it and then she sought additional benefits on the basis that she had not received proper notice. 爆料网AT noted that, as 爆料网DT found, the Appellant received notice of her termination date when she signed the MOU, some four months prior. 爆料网AT held that the fact that a formal letter was received later neither abrogated the MOU nor gave rise to any further compensation. 爆料网AT found no error in the 爆料网DT judgment. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT correctly determined that the Appellant was not entitled to compensation in lieu of notice under the MOU as she had received a notice and had given up her right to contest her termination in the MOU. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Applicant, having entered into an MOU with the Administration for an agreed termination, then sought compensation in lieu of notice for the termination. 爆料网DT dismissed the application.
Legal Principle(s)
A Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) signed by a staff member will normally be enforced.