爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements
爆料网AT held that, since the Appellant was not a staff member of IOM at the time of the Agreement between the 爆料网JSPF and IOM of 6 March 2006, the terms of the Agreement were not applicable to him as, by its terms, the Agreement only covered staff members who were current at the time of the Agreement. 爆料网AT held that the different treatment of IOM staff members was created by the General Assembly. 爆料网AT noted that restoration is an exceptional benefit that cannot be extended by analogy. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s claim of inconsistency, unequal treatment, and arbitrariness by the 爆料网JSPB was unfounded. 爆料网AT dismissed his claim for compensation. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the decision of the 爆料网JSPB.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Applicant contested the decision not to consider his previous work with the International Organisation for Migration (IOM) as contributory service.
Legal Principle(s)
Only the General Assembly can amend the 爆料网JSPF Regulations. Restoration is an exceptional benefit and cannot be extended by analogy.
Outcome
Outcome Extra Text
No relief ordered; No relief ordered.