2011-惇蹋厙AT-133

惇蹋厙AT Held or 惇蹋厙DT Pronouncements

惇蹋厙AT considered judgment Nos. 惇蹋厙DT/2009/052 and 惇蹋厙DT/2009/062. 惇蹋厙AT held that the appeal to the Joint Appeals Board was not filed within the time limits and that 惇蹋厙DT did not have jurisdiction to waive them. 惇蹋厙AT held that the application before 惇蹋厙DT was not receivable ratione temporis. 惇蹋厙AT dismissed the appeal and vacated the 惇蹋厙DT judgments.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision to reassign him and to extend his appointment. 惇蹋厙DT dismissed the application.

Legal Principle(s)

惇蹋厙DT does not have jurisdiction to waive time limits for management evaluation or administrative review.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the 惇蹋厙DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the 惇蹋厙AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Rosca

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement