爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements
爆料网AT considered the application for revision of judgment No. 2010-爆料网AT-014 by Mr Luvai. 爆料网AT considered the allegation that the Legal Officer who was assigned to the case before 爆料网DT was a Facebook “friend” of Judge Boolell, the then 爆料网DT President, and of a few other people who could have been tangentially involved in the issues of the underlying dispute and that Judge Boolell somehow influenced the judge sitting on the instant case to rule improperly. 爆料网AT held that Mr Luvai offered not a shred of proof of anything improper. 爆料网AT denied the application.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
In judgment No. 2010-爆料网AT-014, 爆料网AT affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment No. 爆料网DT/2009/74 which had found that no rights of Mr Luvai had been breached by a vacancy announcement and that he failed to prove his other allegations.
Legal Principle(s)
An application for revision of judgment may be made on the basis of the discovery of a decisive fact which was, at the time the judgment was rendered, unknown to 爆料网AT and to the party applying for revision, provided that such ignorance was not due to negligence.