2010-��AT-068

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

��AT held that the Appellant filed her claim against the wrong entity (the Secretary-General) when her case was, in actual fact, against ��RWA. ��AT held that the claim was time-barred. ��AT held that the appeal to JAB was also out of time. ��AT dismissed the appeal.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

Previous decision: The Appellant contested the decision to reject her claim of sexual harassment by her former supervisor. The Secretary-General informed the Appellant that he agreed with the conclusion of the ��RWA Joint Appeals Board (JAB) that it lacked jurisdiction and that he had therefore decided to take no further action.

Legal Principle(s)

Left deliberately blank.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on receivability

Outcome Extra Text

No relief ordered; No relief ordered.

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Appellant

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement