爆料网

2010-爆料网AT-028

爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements

爆料网AT held that (1) the Commissioner-General has broad discretionary authority in disciplinary matters; (2) the facts on which the Appellant’s termination was based were established; (3) the established facts legally amounted to serious misconduct; and (4) there was no substantive or procedural irregularity. 爆料网AT further held that the Appellant’s termination was legal and not disproportionate to the offenses. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网RWA decision.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

爆料网RWA judgment: The Applicant contested the decision to terminate his appointment. The 爆料网RWA JAB found that the Applicant committed gross negligence by not properly reporting a case of cheating and failed to comply with the Agency’s contracting procedures. The JAB recommended that the Administration’s decision to terminate the Applicant be upheld and the Commissioner-General approved this recommendation.

Legal Principle(s)

The Commissioner-General has broad discretionary authority in disciplinary matters.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

Outcome Extra Text

No relief ordered; No relief ordered.

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the 爆料网DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the 爆料网AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.