2010-��AT-006

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

��AT considered the Appellant��s appeal and upheld ��DT��s judgment. ��AT noted that the Appellant��s request that her challenge of the first recruitment process be placed in abeyance until completion of the second recruitment process was unusual and rightly declined by ��DT. ��AT held that no right of the Appellant was infringed upon, as she had not been denied an opportunity to compete for the post in question. ��AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed ��DT��s judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant requested that ��DT stay the proceedings in her case, concerning a recruitment exercise she has challenged, pending the outcome of the ongoing recruitment process for another post she applied to. ��DT denied her application in its entirety.

Legal Principle(s)

Left deliberately blank.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Hussein

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement