爆料网

爆料网RWA

Showing 151 - 160 of 274
2015-爆料网AT-537, Wishah

爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Commissioner-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT set out the correct legal framework, but thereafter erroneously reviewed the evidence and interfered with the administrative discretion, since 爆料网RWA had established the misconduct by clear and convincing evidence. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT erred in law in its evaluation of the evidence and that 爆料网RWA had established the existence of the facts warranting disciplinary sanction. 爆料网AT held that the procedure and the subsequent decision were lawful and there was no basis to rescind the termination or to award any...

2015-爆料网AT-529, Riano

爆料网AT considered an appeal of judgment Nos. 爆料网RWA/DT/2013/035 and 爆料网RWA/DT/2014/004. 爆料网AT held that there was no basis to support the Appellant’s claim of legitimate expectations and/or rights for the renewal of his contract. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant failed to demonstrate that 爆料网RWA DT erred with respect to the amount awarded for al damages. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT evaluated all the evidence before it and made a reasoned assessment as to the amount of anxiety and stress suffered by the Appellant. 爆料网AT held that it would not lightly interfere with the determination of 爆料网RWA DT. 爆料网AT held...

2015-爆料网AT-528, Rantisi

爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Commissioner-General of the order rescinding the decision to transfer the Appellant and the moral damages award. On the Commissioner-General’s argument that 爆料网DT unduly fettered its discretion to award compensation in lieu of specific performance, 爆料网AT held that, absent any error of law or manifestly unreasonable factual findings, which were not evident, 爆料网AT would not interfere with the discretion vested in 爆料网RWA DT to decide on remedy. 爆料网AT held that, in all of the circumstances of the case, it was not persuaded by the Commissioner-General’s argument that...

2015-爆料网AT-514, Abu Nada

爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT correctly determined that it did not have jurisdiction to review the decision to suspend him without pay. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was alert to the injury which the prolonged delay caused the Appellant. On the Appellant’s complaint that 爆料网RWA DT did not address his complaint regarding the deduction by 爆料网RWA from his personal Provident Fund contributions upon his dismissal, apparently, to recoup an overpayment, 爆料网AT held that there was no merit in the complaint and the Appellant failed to demonstrate any error of law or fact on the part of the 爆料网RWA DT when it determined these...

2015-爆料网AT-504, Hassan

爆料网AT held that the Appellant raised the same issues he raised before 爆料网RWA DT and did not identify how the judgment was in any way defective. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant did not identify any of the required grounds of appeal and failed to demonstrate that 爆料网RWA DT committed any error of fact or law in arriving at its decision. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s case was fully and fairly considered by 爆料网RWA DT and found no error of law or fact in its decision. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网RWA DT judgment.

2015-爆料网AT-502, Khashan

爆料网AT held that, in protesting against the non-inclusion of his Transitional Personal Allowance in his retirement benefit, the Appellant had failed to appreciate the distinction between an allowance and base salary. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT correctly found that under the applicable Staff Rules, the Appellant’s retirement benefit did not include the Transitional Personal Allowance. 爆料网AT found no error in the 爆料网RWA DT’s finding that the Appellant had not submitted a timely request for decision review with respect to his allegation of impropriety of his transfer and that therefore that claim was...

2015-爆料网AT-497, Chaaban

爆料网AT considered two applications, one for correction and one for revision, relating to judgment No. 2013-爆料网AT-363. 爆料网AT held that Mr Chaaban failed to show any clerical or arithmetical mistake to justify the correction of the judgment. 爆料网AT held that Mr Chaaban failed to identify any decisive fact unknown at the time of the judgment to warrant its revision. 爆料网AT dismissed both applications.

2015-爆料网AT-495, Diab

爆料网AT held that the Appellant did not indicate any errors on the part of 爆料网RWA DT that would require a reversal of its judgment. 爆料网AT held that there was no error in 爆料网RWA DT’s finding. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant did not comply with the filing deadlines. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT did not commit any error when it determined that the application before it was not receivable as it was time-barred. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal.

2016-爆料网AT-701, Husseini

爆料网AT held that both the ASC and APD bestow discretion on the Agency to pay an AAA. 爆料网AT held that the two instruments, the ASC and the APD, were easily reconcilable. 爆料网AT held that the ASC deals with the specific situation where an Area staff member acts in an International professional post, while the ADP deals with all other cases of acting appointments. 爆料网AT held that there was no manifest intention or inevitable construction that the Agency intended to abrogate the specific policy in the ASC. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT was correct in its finding that the ASC had not been implicitly abrogated...

2016-爆料网AT-690, Abu Malluh

爆料网AT considered the appeal, specifically whether 爆料网RWA DT erred by dismissing the staff members’ motions to adduce supplemental evidence on the grounds of receivability, and whether 爆料网RWA DT erred by finding that the final contested decision was taken on 3 August 2014. 爆料网AT found that Abu Malluh et al. acted with due diligence in the proceedings before 爆料网RWA DT and further demonstrated that the supplemental evidence they sought to have admitted would have led to different findings of fact and changed the outcome of the case. 爆料网AT noted that while 爆料网RWA DT has broad discretion to determine the...