爆料网

爆料网HCR

Showing 111 - 120 of 360
2011-爆料网AT-188, Harding

爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that the compensation awarded to Ms Harding for the loss of salary and other entitlements from the date of her dismissal to the date of the 爆料网DT judgment with interest was excessive. 爆料网AT held that it must take into account that she received compensation on or around 18 February 2008 and it could not consider the loss of earnings as actual harm after that date when the non-reinstatement was known to the claimant and the offered compensation caused by that circumstance had already been paid. 爆料网AT held that a total of 2. 5 years’ net...

2011-爆料网AT-135, Larkin

爆料网AT held that the services provided by OSLA and the way the representation is implemented can have an impact on a staff member’s terms of employment and can therefore fall within the jurisdiction of 爆料网DT, without interfering with the professional independence of counsel. 爆料网AT held that the decision taken by the former Chief of OSLA not to disclose a potential conflict of interest in the staff member’s case could have an impact on his terms of employment and, therefore, constituted an administrative decision subject to review by 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT reversed the 爆料网DT judgment and remanded the case to...

2011-爆料网AT-175, Dualeh

爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that Mr Dualeh was not promoted as a result of the fact that the other candidates had scored higher than he had and he would not have been promoted even if the other candidates had not been promoted. 爆料网AT held that the procedural irregularity had no impact on his non-promotion. 爆料网AT held that the direct effect of an irregularity will only result in the rescission of the decision not to promote a staff member when he or she would have had a significant chance of promotion. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT should neither have rescinded the...

2011-爆料网AT-174, Bofill

爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that Ms Bofill was not promoted as a result of the fact that the other candidates had scored higher than she had and she would not have been promoted even if the other candidates had not been promoted. 爆料网AT held that the procedural irregularity had no impact on her non-promotion. 爆料网AT held that the direct effect of an irregularity will only result in the rescission of the decision not to promote a staff member when he or she would have had a significant chance of promotion. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT should neither have rescinded the...

2011-爆料网AT-172, Vangelova

爆料网AT held that an irregularity in promotion procedures could only result in the rescission of the decision not to promote a staff member when he or she would have had a significant chance for promotion. 爆料网AT held that there must be a link between the irregularity and the non-promotion decision. Thus, where the irregularity has no impact on the status of a staff member because he or she had no foreseeable chance for promotion, he or she is not entitled to rescission or compensation. 爆料网AT upheld the appeal and vacated the 爆料网DT judgment.

2011-爆料网AT-152, Ishak

爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT correctly held that the Appellant’s case was not receivable. 爆料网AT held that a selection process involved a series of steps or findings which led to the administrative decision, and that these steps may only be challenged in the context of an appeal against the outcome of the selection process, but cannot alone be the subject of an appeal to the 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT’s decision to order the Appellant to pay the sum of CHF 2,000, was justified because he filed a frivolous application and made all kinds of baseless charges against the fairness of the 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT...

2011-爆料网AT-143, Appellant

爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT properly determined that the issue before it was the failure of the Administration to address the Appellant’s formal complaint. 爆料网AT held that there was no error of law or failure to exercise jurisdiction on the part of 爆料网DT with regard to the Appellant’s request for an investigation. 爆料网AT held that it was satisfied that the award by 爆料网DT of USD 40,000 constituted sufficient satisfaction for the Appellant. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT correctly refused to entertain the request for compensation for economic loss because the Appellant’s separation from service was not the subject of...

2011-爆料网AT-134, Larkin

爆料网AT considered appeals against 爆料网DT judgment Nos. 爆料网DT/2010/108 and 爆料网DT/2010/109 jointly. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT correctly ascertained that the failure by the APPC to share with the Appellant an inter-office memorandum prepared by his supervisor regarding the non-extension of his appointment did not affect his legal situation. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant did not demonstrate that the 爆料网DT’s finding of fact was not supported by the evidence or that it was unreasonable. 爆料网AT held that the principle that the party in whose favour a case has been decided is not permitted to appeal against the...

2012-爆料网AT-265, Ljungdell

Regarding the allegations that 爆料网DT erred in law, fact, and procedure and failed to exercise its jurisdiction in relation to her allegations of discrimination, 爆料网AT held that the burden was on the Appellant to establish that the oral and documentary evidence, if admitted, would have led to different findings of fact, and changed the outcome of the case. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had not erred in rejecting the Appellant’s allegations that she had been subjected to discrimination on the grounds of gender or based on her family responsibilities and her expressed desire to work part-time. Regarding the...

2012-爆料网AT-263, Larkin

爆料网AT considered an appeal of judgment No. 爆料网DT/2011/179. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant had failed to demonstrate that 爆料网DT erred in finding that there was no evidence of a conflict of interest or prejudice to his case. 爆料网AT noted that 爆料网DT has broad discretion to determine the admissibility of any evidence under Article 18. 1 of the 爆料网DT RoP and that it had exercised its discretion in deciding not to admit the evidence because it lacked probative value. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had correctly found there were no meaningful indicia of a conflict of interest involving the Chief of OSLA regarding the...