爆料网

Dismissal/separation

  • Abuse of authority
  • Abuse of privileges and immunities
  • Assault (verbal and physical)
  • Breach of duties of independence, neutrality, and impartiality
  • Disciplinary measure or sanction
  • Discrimination (see category: discrimination)
  • Dismissal/separation
  • Facts (establishment of) / evidence
  • Failure to comply with private legal obligations
  • Failure to report misconduct
  • Fraud, misrepresentation and false certification
  • Gross negligence
  • Harassment (non-sexual)
  • Inappropriate or disruptive behaviour
  • Investigation (see category
  • Investigation (see category: Investigation)
  • Misuse of information and communication technology resources
  • Misuse of office
  • Misuse of official documents
  • Misuse of or failure to exercise reasonable care in relation to 爆料网 property or assets
  • Non-disciplinary/administrative measures
  • Procurement irregularities
  • Prohibited activity under ST/SGB/2004/15 (Use of Information and Communication Technology Resources and Data)
  • Proportionality of sanction
  • Retaliation
  • Sexual exploitation and abuse
  • Sexual harassment
  • Theft and misappropriation
  • Unauthorised outside activities and conflict of interest
  • Violation of local laws
    • Showing 81 - 90 of 160
    2014-爆料网AT-398, Kamara

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had nor erred in law or fact rendering its judgment. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant had failed to persuade the Court that 爆料网DT’s conclusion of fact had rendered the decision unreasonable as required by Article 2 of the 爆料网AT Statute. 爆料网AT held that the evidence clearly supported the finding of gross negligence and loss of property, as well as the existence of the misconduct. 爆料网AT held that there was no due process violation on the part of the Administration for having charged the Appellant with three accounts of misconduct. 爆料网AT held that the misconduct had been established...

    2015-爆料网AT-545, Jaffa

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred by considering as mitigating factors the recommendation of Mr Jaffa’s immediate supervisors that his actions warranted a reprimand and the fact that Mr Jaffa continued to perform for two further years (with positive reviews). 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in not attaching sufficient importance to the fact that Mr Jaffa held a position of trust as a Finance Assistant. 爆料网AT held that the Secretary-General had not overlooked relevant mitigating factors in imposing the sanction of separation from service. 爆料网AT held that it...

    2015-爆料网AT-537, Wishah

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Commissioner-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT set out the correct legal framework, but thereafter erroneously reviewed the evidence and interfered with the administrative discretion, since 爆料网RWA had established the misconduct by clear and convincing evidence. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT erred in law in its evaluation of the evidence and that 爆料网RWA had established the existence of the facts warranting disciplinary sanction. 爆料网AT held that the procedure and the subsequent decision were lawful and there was no basis to rescind the termination or to award any...

    2015-爆料网AT-510, Cobarrubias

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that the sanction imposed on Mr Cobarrubias was not unreasonable, absurd or disproportionate. 爆料网AT held that it was a reasonable exercise of the Administration’s broad discretion in disciplinary matters, with which it would not lightly interfere. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in finding the sanction disproportionate and in substituting its opinion for that of the Administration. 爆料网AT vacated the 爆料网DT judgment.

    2016-爆料网AT-700, Negussie

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had violated the Appellant’s due process rights by not rendering a fully reasoned judgment and had thus committed an error in procedure such as to affect the decision of the case. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT should have examined and stated in its judgment whether there was clear and convincing evidence that the Appellant continued to fight in a severe manner causing physical injury. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT should have addressed the question as to whether there was clear and convincing evidence that the Appellant had used physical force against a driver in April 2013, especially since...

    2017-爆料网AT-782, Muindi

    爆料网AT held that the summary dismissal decision was unlawful because the due process rights under IMO’s Staff Regulations and Staff Rules were substantially violated. The Appellant had been charged with misconduct in the form of fraudulent activities undertaken to gain diplomatic accreditation, namely giving instructions to append an electronic signature to an official IMO communication without authorization or instruction by that colleague and misrepresenting his contractual status as internationally recruited in that communication. Noting that the Secretary-General of IMO considered the...

    2018-爆料网AT-889, Sall

    爆料网AT considered the appeal of the Appellant and the cross-appeal of the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT denied the Appellant’s request for an oral hearing, noting that it would not have added any further value or clarification of the factual and legal issues. 爆料网AT held that the Secretary-General's cross-appeal was receivable, according to Article 9(4) of the RoP. 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT erred in holding that the disciplinary investigation was flawed by procedural irregularities. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in finding that the disciplinary decision was unlawful and, accordingly, that there could neither...

    2018-爆料网AT-888, Al Saleh

    爆料网AT considered the Appellant’s request for an oral hearing and claims for moral damages and reinstatement. 爆料网AT held that the factual and legal issues arising from the appeal have already been clearly defined by the parties and did not find that an oral hearing would “assist in the expeditious and fair disposal of the case. ” To that end, 爆料网AT denied the Appellant’s request for an oral hearing. 爆料网AT found no fault with 爆料网RWA DT’s conclusion that it was highly probable that the Appellant had a leadership role in the armed clashes of 18 June 2015. 爆料网AT held that there was no evidence to suggest...

    2018-爆料网AT-862, Majut

    On appeal by the Secretary-General, 爆料网AT found that 爆料网DT erred in fact and in law in its finding that the facts of misconduct were not established by clear and convincing evidence. 爆料网AT noted that a proper consideration of the whole of the evidence could only have led to one conclusion, and that is that the individual assaulted the victim. 爆料网AT found that 爆料网DT did not consider the evidence objectively, specifically by giving misplaced importance to minor inconsistencies, coming to unreasonable conclusions on the facts which were not supported by the evidence, and making speculations instead of...

    2018-爆料网AT-819, Mbaigolmem

    爆料网AT held that the undisputed facts, the evidence of a credible report, coherent hearsay evidence pointing to a pattern of behaviour, the consistency of the witness statements, the unsatisfactory statement of the staff member, and the inherent probabilities of the situation, taken cumulatively, constituted a clear and convincing concatenation of evidence establishing, with a high degree of probability, that the alleged misconduct in fact occurred. 爆料网AT noted that the Organisation is entitled to and obliged to pursue a severe approach to sexual harassment and that the message, therefore, needs...