爆料网

Disciplinary measure or sanction

  • Abuse of authority
  • Abuse of privileges and immunities
  • Assault (verbal and physical)
  • Breach of duties of independence, neutrality, and impartiality
  • Disciplinary measure or sanction
  • Discrimination (see category: discrimination)
  • Dismissal/separation
  • Facts (establishment of) / evidence
  • Failure to comply with private legal obligations
  • Failure to report misconduct
  • Fraud, misrepresentation and false certification
  • Gross negligence
  • Harassment (non-sexual)
  • Inappropriate or disruptive behaviour
  • Investigation (see category
  • Investigation (see category: Investigation)
  • Misuse of information and communication technology resources
  • Misuse of office
  • Misuse of official documents
  • Misuse of or failure to exercise reasonable care in relation to 爆料网 property or assets
  • Non-disciplinary/administrative measures
  • Procurement irregularities
  • Prohibited activity under ST/SGB/2004/15 (Use of Information and Communication Technology Resources and Data)
  • Proportionality of sanction
  • Retaliation
  • Sexual exploitation and abuse
  • Sexual harassment
  • Theft and misappropriation
  • Unauthorised outside activities and conflict of interest
  • Violation of local laws
    • Showing 91 - 100 of 202
    2013-爆料网AT-291, Perelli

    爆料网AT considered two appeals by Ms Perelli, against judgment Nos. 爆料网DT/2012/034 and 爆料网DT/2012/100. On the matter of due process, given Ms Perelli had the opportunity to rebut allegations and contents of the relevant report, 爆料网AT held that these procedural steps were part of her due process entitlements and, to the extent that 爆料网DT found the Administration to have respected these procedural steps, 爆料网AT upheld the finding of 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT held that the Investigation Panel report satisfied neither the remit given to it nor the statutory requirements of ST/AI/371. 爆料网AT held that Ms Perelli was...

    2013-爆料网AT-280, Applicant

    爆料网AT considered two appeals by the Secretary-General of judgment Nos. 爆料网DT/2011/106 and 爆料网DT/2011/192. 爆料网AT held that it was satisfied that the Complainant did not share the Applicant’s desire to pursue a sexual relationship and that the Applicant’s conduct was unwelcome. 爆料网AT held that the transmission by the Applicant of a photograph of his genitalia to a female colleague, much less a colleague under his supervision, could at its best, as found by the Joint Disciplinary Committee (JDC), be characterised as outrageous and most probably unwanted. 爆料网AT held that the Secretary-General had clear...

    2014-爆料网AT-486, Khan

    As a preliminary matter, 爆料网AT denied the Appellant’s request for an oral hearing. 爆料网AT then considered the Appellant’s claims that the facts were not established by clear and convincing evidence, that there were procedural flaws during the disciplinary proceedings, and that his separation from service was not warranted. 爆料网AT held that clear and convincing evidence showed that the Appellant harassed all the alleged victims and abused his authority, in violation of WFP’s Harassment Policy. 爆料网AT also held that 爆料网DT correctly found that the sanction of separation from service was proportionate...

    2014-爆料网AT-431, Mousa

    爆料网AT held that the Appellant had failed to establish any error in fact or law which would warrant the reversal of the 爆料网RWA DT judgment under appeal. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT had correctly characterized the contested administrative decision subject to its judicial review as a demotion and subsequent transfer, which was taken after disciplinary proceedings. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT had not erred when, after conducting an adequate review of the requirements for the adoption of a disciplinary measure, it concluded that there had been misconduct and that the sanction was legal and proportionate to...

    2014-爆料网AT-415, Santos

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. As a preliminary matter, 爆料网AT rejected the request for an oral hearing finding there was no need for further clarification. 爆料网AT held that the reliance of the Administration on disciplinary/administrative measures to deny the staff member’s conversion to permanent appointment did not give 爆料网DT a carte blanche to go behind the agreed sanctions imposed on 20 April 2009. 爆料网AT held that it was not within 爆料网DT’s competence or jurisdiction to embark on an inquiry into whether the 2009 disciplinary sanctions were lawfully imposed or otherwise...

    2014-爆料网AT-408, Jahnsen Lecca

    爆料网AT found no merit to the Appellant’s claims that 爆料网DT had failed to make findings on the specific category of misconduct and that she did not receive notice of the specific charge of theft prior to receiving a disciplinary sanction. 爆料网AT held that disciplinary cases were not criminal and that there was no need to give notice of a specific charge of theft because the charge against the Appellant was taking, without authorisation, a staff member’s property. 爆料网AT noted that the Appellant did not dispute having taken a bicycle without the owner’s permission, but that she claimed she did not...

    2014-爆料网AT-407, Toukolon

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT’s conclusion, that the assault committed was not misconduct and that the Organisation’s jurisdictional competence did not extend to the physical assault of a non-爆料网 staff member even where the assault is perpetrated by a staff member, was based on reasoning which was unsupported by law or the facts. 爆料网AT held that, not only the issue had not been raised in the case presented to 爆料网DT, but such a proposition had also no foundation in the staff regulations, staff rules, administrative instructions, or jurisprudence. 爆料网AT held...

    2014-爆料网AT-403, Diabagate

    爆料网AT noted that V01 had not been placed under oath before giving her interview and that she did not sign the transcribed version of her interview statement. 爆料网AT held that V01’s transcribed statement, in which she said that the Appellant had raped her and engaged in sex with her, was neither reliable nor trustworthy; it was solely hearsay and insufficient, by itself, to prove the charge that the Appellant engaged in sexual activity with a minor. 爆料网AT held that similarly the other written documents were replete with hearsay and multiple hearsays and were neither trustworthy nor sufficient to...

    2014-爆料网AT-398, Kamara

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had nor erred in law or fact rendering its judgment. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant had failed to persuade the Court that 爆料网DT’s conclusion of fact had rendered the decision unreasonable as required by Article 2 of the 爆料网AT Statute. 爆料网AT held that the evidence clearly supported the finding of gross negligence and loss of property, as well as the existence of the misconduct. 爆料网AT held that there was no due process violation on the part of the Administration for having charged the Appellant with three accounts of misconduct. 爆料网AT held that the misconduct had been established...

    2015-爆料网AT-550, Mizyed

    爆料网AT held that the evidence against the Appellant uncovered by the investigation was so overwhelming that the only reasonable conclusion available to 爆料网DT was that the facts were established by clear and convincing evidence. Noting that the evidence that he was in possession of the stolen card and that he used it to refuel his own private vehicle was not contested by the Appellant, 爆料网AT held that his explanation of how he came into possession of the stolen card and how he came to use it was incapable of belief. 爆料网AT agreed with the finding of 爆料网DT that the established facts amounted to serious...