爆料网

Disciplinary matters / misconduct

  • Abuse of authority
  • Abuse of privileges and immunities
  • Assault (verbal and physical)
  • Breach of duties of independence, neutrality, and impartiality
  • Disciplinary measure or sanction
  • Discrimination (see category: discrimination)
  • Dismissal/separation
  • Facts (establishment of) / evidence
  • Failure to comply with private legal obligations
  • Failure to report misconduct
  • Fraud, misrepresentation and false certification
  • Gross negligence
  • Harassment (non-sexual)
  • Inappropriate or disruptive behaviour
  • Investigation (see category
  • Investigation (see category: Investigation)
  • Misuse of information and communication technology resources
  • Misuse of office
  • Misuse of official documents
  • Misuse of or failure to exercise reasonable care in relation to 爆料网 property or assets
  • Non-disciplinary/administrative measures
  • Procurement irregularities
  • Prohibited activity under ST/SGB/2004/15 (Use of Information and Communication Technology Resources and Data)
  • Proportionality of sanction
  • Retaliation
  • Sexual exploitation and abuse
  • Sexual harassment
  • Theft and misappropriation
  • Unauthorised outside activities and conflict of interest
  • Violation of local laws
    • Showing 301 - 310 of 722
    2015-爆料网AT-572, Ivanov

    爆料网AT held that the Appellant, though entitled to receive a summary of the findings of the investigation report, was not entitled to receive a copy of the full investigation report without showing exceptional circumstances, which he did not do and 爆料网AT, therefore, upheld the findings of 爆料网DT on this point. On compensation, 爆料网AT noted that the Appellant presented no evidence to prove that the violation of the three-month deadline undermined the investigation and the outcome of the complaint, or that he suffered actual prejudice. 爆料网AT held that the Administration’s offer of USD 1,000 was...

    2015-爆料网AT-550, Mizyed

    爆料网AT held that the evidence against the Appellant uncovered by the investigation was so overwhelming that the only reasonable conclusion available to 爆料网DT was that the facts were established by clear and convincing evidence. Noting that the evidence that he was in possession of the stolen card and that he used it to refuel his own private vehicle was not contested by the Appellant, 爆料网AT held that his explanation of how he came into possession of the stolen card and how he came to use it was incapable of belief. 爆料网AT agreed with the finding of 爆料网DT that the established facts amounted to serious...

    2015-爆料网AT-545, Jaffa

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred by considering as mitigating factors the recommendation of Mr Jaffa’s immediate supervisors that his actions warranted a reprimand and the fact that Mr Jaffa continued to perform for two further years (with positive reviews). 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in not attaching sufficient importance to the fact that Mr Jaffa held a position of trust as a Finance Assistant. 爆料网AT held that the Secretary-General had not overlooked relevant mitigating factors in imposing the sanction of separation from service. 爆料网AT held that it...

    2015-爆料网AT-549, Ogorodnikov

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that the Secretary-General’s appeal was filed on time and was receivable. 爆料网AT held that, since the parties agreed to and identified the facts in their Joint Statement, it was not open to 爆料网DT to conduct its own evaluation and then to substitute its view for that of the parties. 爆料网AT held that the misconduct was of a grave and serious nature and in those circumstances, the sanction of separation was reasonable and not disproportionate and/or arbitrary. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred when it reversed the Secretary-General’s decision to...

    2015-爆料网AT-535, Rangel

    爆料网AT had before it three decisions of the Conciliation Committee: the first regarding the establishment of two inquiry panels, Panel One and Panel Two; the second in respect of the decision to place the Appellant on administrative leave with pay, and the third concerning the decision to separate her from service. As a preliminary matter, 爆料网AT did not admit to the case file two motions submitted by the Appellant subsequent to the issuance of judgment No. 2015-爆料网AT-531, as 爆料网AT held that the documents that she sought to adduce would not assist 爆料网AT with its consideration on the merits. By way of...

    2015-爆料网AT-537, Wishah

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Commissioner-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT set out the correct legal framework, but thereafter erroneously reviewed the evidence and interfered with the administrative discretion, since 爆料网RWA had established the misconduct by clear and convincing evidence. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT erred in law in its evaluation of the evidence and that 爆料网RWA had established the existence of the facts warranting disciplinary sanction. 爆料网AT held that the procedure and the subsequent decision were lawful and there was no basis to rescind the termination or to award any...

    2015-爆料网AT-523, Portillo Moya

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in law in concluding that the imposed disciplinary sanction was disproportionate and consequently substituting it for a lesser one. 爆料网AT held that serious misconduct was established and the disciplinary measure of separation from service without termination indemnity was proportionate. 爆料网AT noted that the misconduct put public health at risk as the food was distributed with altered expiration dates to hide the fact of its expiration. 爆料网AT held that the imposed sanction was neither absurd nor disproportionate and...

    2015-爆料网AT-525, Flores

    爆料网AT considered both an appeal by Ms Flores requesting an increase in compensation and a cross-appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err in either determining that there were procedural violations that warranted rescission of the separation decision or in its determination that Ms Flores was not entitled to reinstatement (justifying a material award) as her contract was due to expire shortly after receipt of the dismissal letter. 爆料网AT noted that Ms Flores was not informed prior to the interview what the allegations were. Noting that the records indicated that Ms Flores...

    2015-爆料网AT-518, Oummih

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in concluding that the refusal by the former Executive Director to open an investigation into all the allegations raised violated ST/SGB/2008/5. 爆料网AT held that the Administration has a degree of discretion as to how to conduct a review and assessment of a complaint and may decide whether to undertake a fact-finding investigation into all or some of the allegations. 爆料网AT affirmed 爆料网DT’s conclusion that the former Executive Director did not comply with ST/SGB/2008/5 by hiring two consultants from outside the Organisation to conduct the investigation. Under ST/SGB/2008/5...

    2015-爆料网AT-514, Abu Nada

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT correctly determined that it did not have jurisdiction to review the decision to suspend him without pay. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was alert to the injury which the prolonged delay caused the Appellant. On the Appellant’s complaint that 爆料网RWA DT did not address his complaint regarding the deduction by 爆料网RWA from his personal Provident Fund contributions upon his dismissal, apparently, to recoup an overpayment, 爆料网AT held that there was no merit in the complaint and the Appellant failed to demonstrate any error of law or fact on the part of the 爆料网RWA DT when it determined these...