2015-爆料网AT-582, Kacan
爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT’s interpretation of the relevant jurisprudence was correct and that it did not commit any error in law. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT took care to examine the evidence in order to ascertain if, in fact, an express promise of renewal had been made to the Appellant. Noting that 爆料网DT was unable to find any such evidence, 爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s submissions regarding his work experience, duties, and responsibilities, functions of his duty station, and his interest in a renewal had no merit as grounds for an expectancy of renewal. 爆料网AT held that it was satisfied that 爆料网DT’s...