±¬ÁÏÍø

The ±¬ÁÏÍøAT, citing the principle of res judicata, noted that the authority of a final judgment could not be so readily set aside. The ±¬ÁÏÍøAT held that the limited grounds and the gravest of reasons required for setting aside a final judgment by an appellate court are not met in this case.

The ±¬ÁÏÍøAT found that, as the staff member also acknowledges, the current request fell outside of the permissible grounds for revision, correction, or interpretation.

The ±¬ÁÏÍøAT decided that there were no grounds for it to review this matter in any way, dismissed the staff member's application and affirmed the...

±¬ÁÏÍøAT considered an application for interpretation of judgment No. 2010-±¬ÁÏÍøAT-026bis. ±¬ÁÏÍøAT held that the language of the judgment was clear in its meaning and required no interpretation. ±¬ÁÏÍøAT denied the application.

±¬ÁÏÍøAT noted that the Appellant was asked to present updated medical information to support her request for a review of her case and failed to do so. ±¬ÁÏÍøAT held that no prejudice existed against the Appellant, since she had an opportunity to present updated medical evidence within the scope of the review of her case. ±¬ÁÏÍøAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the Standing Committee decision.