爆料网

爆料网RWA International Staff Rules

  • 111.2(3)a
  • Appendix A
  • IPD 1/10
  • Rule 1
  • Rule 1.2
  • Rule 1.2(c)
  • Rule 1.2(f)
  • Rule 11.2
  • Rule 11.2(c)
  • Rule 111.2
    • Showing 11 - 12 of 12
    爆料网DT/2010/115, Applicant

    When attempting to establish a pattern of retaliation with regard to past decisions, the question is one of the relevance of those decisions, not receivability. Whether or not the SGB on retaliation was in force at the time an act or decision took place, the act or decision can still be considered retaliatory and constitute serious misconduct. The burden on the respondent of proving “by clear and convincing evidence” in respect of decisions made before the provision came into effect that “it would have taken the same action absent the protected activity” (ST/SGB/2005/21) applies to decisions...