爆料网

爆料网RWA DT Statute

  • Article 10
  • Article 10.5
  • Article 10.5(b)
  • Article 10.6
  • Article 10.8
  • Article 10(4)
  • Article 10(5)(a)
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 11(4)
  • Article 11(5)
  • Article 12.1
  • Article 12.3
  • Article 2
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.5
  • Article 3
  • Article 4.7
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1(c)
  • Article 8.1(d)
  • Article 8.1(d)(ii)
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 8.4
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.1
  • Article 9.2
    • Showing 41 - 50 of 127
    2013-爆料网AT-371, Brisson

    爆料网AT noted that there had been a policy change in 1997 which meant that staff members who requested pension as a result of an accident suffered in the service of the Organisation post-1997 were granted it with the proviso that it would only be paid until they retired. 爆料网AT held that, as the Appellant’s accident occurred long after the policy change in 1997, the changed policy was applicable. 爆料网AT held that as the Appellant had reached retirement age at the time of the incapacitating injury, his appeal had to be dismissed. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal.

    2013-爆料网AT-369, Darwish

    爆料网AT affirmed the 爆料网RWA DT decision that the application was not receivable as consistent with 爆料网RWA Area Staff Rule 111. 2 and Article 8 of the 爆料网RWA DT Statute. On alleged errors in procedure, 爆料网AT noted that the Appellant had no opportunity to challenge the untimeliness of the Commissioner-General’s reply before 爆料网RWA DT, but that, since the Appellant had not demonstrated how the untimely reply affected 爆料网RWA DT’s decision on receivability, 爆料网AT found no merit on this ground. 爆料网AT held that there was no error in 爆料网RWA DT’s reasoning on the issue of EVR. 爆料网AT held that, absent an appealable...

    2013-爆料网AT-363, Chaaban

    爆料网AT held there was no error in the 爆料网RWA DT’s finding that the application was time-barred. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT has, in principle, the discretion to accept 爆料网RWA’s late reply in circumstances where 爆料网RWA has not filed a motion seeking leave to do so and without proprio motu ordering 爆料网RWA to file a reply. Noting the Administration’s reply was due before the transitional period into the new system of justice began, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT erred when it granted a waiver of time after an excessive period of time had passed which was based on inaccurate facts and an invalid reason. 爆料网AT held...

    2013-爆料网AT-311, Pirnea

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that the reasons proffered by the Administration for not renewing Mr Pirnea’s appointment were valid, namely that he could no longer perform his functions in Somalia since his life was at risk there. 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT’s conclusion that the Administration had hidden reasons for not renewing Mr Pirnea’s appointment was based solely on speculation and that 爆料网DT erred on a question of law and fact resulting in a manifestly unreasonable decision when it concluded that there was no valid reason for the non-renewal. 爆料网AT noted that...

    2013-爆料网AT-304, Al Surkhi et al.

    爆料网AT held that the relevant Circular contained all the necessary components to give rise to legal consequences for the striking staff and that it had individual application. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT committed no legal error when it decided that the relevant administrative decision for the purpose of former Area Staff Rule 111.3 was the decision communicated by way of the Circular and that 爆料网RWA DT correctly determined the terminus a quo for the purpose of computing the time for requesting administrative review. 爆料网AT upheld the 爆料网RWA DT’s determination as to the limits of its jurisdiction. 爆料网AT...

    2013-爆料网AT-292, Abu Jarbou

    爆料网AT held that it was a procedural error to allow the Commissioner-General to participate in the proceedings and to file a late reply without a written order, but that the Appellant was not prejudiced by that error and the error did not violate his due process rights. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s failure to object to the Respondent’s late reply before 爆料网RWA DT did not prevent him from raising on appeal the question of procedural error. On the Appellant’s claim that 爆料网RWA DT erred when it did not permit him to file a rejoinder to the Respondent’s reply, 爆料网AT held that since the Appellant did...

    2014-爆料网AT-433-Corr.1, Hersh

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had correctly stated that even if it could be argued that the profile of the Broadcast Technology Officer (BTO P-4) post had changed due to the drafting of new Terms of Reference (TOR) by Ms Hermann, the only viable course of action in the circumstances for the purposes of filling it would have been a regular, competitive selection process and not a comparative review as happened in this case. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was correct in finding that the so-called comparative review between Ms Hersh and Mr Tobgyal for the only post...

    2014-爆料网AT-433/Corr.1, Hersh

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had correctly stated that even if it could be argued that the profile of the Broadcast Technology Officer (BTO P-4) post had changed due to the drafting of new Terms of Reference (TOR) by Ms Hermann, the only viable course of action in the circumstances for the purposes of filling it would have been a regular, competitive selection process and not a comparative review as happened in this case. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was correct in finding that the so-called comparative review between Ms Hersh and Mr Tobgyal for the only post...

    2014-爆料网AT-442, El-Khalek

    爆料网RWA DT considered an appeal by the Commissioner-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT did not err in fact or in law such as to vitiate its judgment, except with regards to the award of compensation. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT did not overstep its role to judicially review the administrative decision imposing a disciplinary measure on the staff member and terminating his appointment. 爆料网AT held that the Administration had failed to demonstrate that the staff member had committed the serious misconduct he had been charged with, because not only did the proceedings fail to provide him with an adequate...

    2014-爆料网AT-433, Hersh

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had correctly stated that even if it could be argued that the profile of the Broadcast Technology Officer (BTO P-4) post had changed due to the drafting of new Terms of Reference (TOR) by Ms Hermann, the only viable course of action in the circumstances for the purposes of filling it would have been a regular, competitive selection process and not a comparative review as happened in this case. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was correct in finding that the so-called comparative review between Ms Hersh and Mr Tobgyal for the only post...