爆料网

爆料网JSPF Regulations

  • Annex I
  • Annex IV
  • Annex ll
  • Article 1
  • Article 1(l)
  • Article 1(q)
  • Article 1(v)
  • Article 10
  • Article 13
  • Article 2
  • Article 22
  • Article 22(b)
  • Article 22(c)
  • Article 24
  • Article 24(a)
  • Article 25
  • Article 25(b)(i)
  • Article 27
  • Article 28
  • Article 28(d)
  • Article 29
  • Article 29(e)
  • Article 30
  • Article 30(b)
  • Article 31
  • Article 31 (b) (ii)
  • Article 31(a)
  • Article 31(b)(i)
  • Article 32
  • Article 32(a)
  • Article 32(b)
  • Article 33
  • Article 33(a)
  • Article 34
  • Article 35
  • Article 35(b)(i)
  • Article 35ter
  • Article 38
  • Article 4(b)
  • Article 4(c)
  • Article 40
  • Article 44
  • Article 45
  • Article 48
  • Article 48(a)
  • Article 49(b)
  • Article 50
  • Article 50(b)
  • Article 53
  • Article 54
  • Article 6
  • Article 6(a)
  • Former Regulation 31
  • Former Regulation 35
  • Regulation 1(n)
  • Regulation 30(a)
  • Section H.5
  • Section K
  • Section K.1
  • Section K.5
  • Section K.8(a)
  • Section K.8(b)
    • Showing 51 - 60 of 77
    2017-爆料网AT-728, Domzalski

    On receivability, 爆料网AT held that the appeal was receivable insofar as it related to the 爆料网JSPF decision to deduct child support from the Appellant’s pension in accordance with Article 45 of the 爆料网JSPF Regulations. As to the appeal related to repayment of a sum paid directly to the Appellant’s estranged spouse as child’s benefit under Article 36 of the 爆料网JSPF Regulations, 爆料网AT held that this aspect was not receivable for failure to challenge in a timely manner the decision and that his claim regarding due process with respect to direct payments under Article 36 had no merit. On the merits of...

    2018-爆料网AT-834, Fox

    爆料网AT considered the appeal. 爆料网AT noted that the relationship between a pension fund and its members and beneficiaries is determined principally by the Regulations of the Fund and that there is no other explicit contractual basis obliging the Fund to assume duties beyond those expressly provided for in the Regulations and Administrative Rules. However, 爆料网AT emphasized the importance of contracts being executed in good faith. 爆料网AT found that the Fund breached its duty of good faith because the correspondence between the Appellant and the Fund indicated that she needed assistance and further...

    2018-爆料网AT-830, Schepens

    爆料网AT held, considering that the Appellant had elected to take a deferred retirement benefit after 1 April 2007 and not taken a withdrawal settlement, that the Fund had no discretion to make an exception under Article 24(a) of 爆料网JSPF Regulations. Regarding the submission that the Fund was in breach of a duty of good faith by not adequately informing the Appellant of the amendment and its implications, 爆料网AT held that it cannot be expected of the Fund to provide information in relation to every conceivable contingency or possibility that might or might not eventuate in the future. 爆料网AT further...

    2019-爆料网AT-922, Haq and Kane

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. On receivability, 爆料网AT opined that it doubted whether the application was receivable, but due to some uncertainties and because the matter was of general interest, it would decide the case on the merits. On the merits, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in law in finding that Ms Haq and Ms Kane had a fundamental right to be fully and accurately informed about their pension entitlements at the time of their appointments. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in law in failing to consider that Staff Regulation 4. 1 does not oblige the Secretary-General to transmit...

    2019-爆料网AT-914, Oglesby

    爆料网AT found that at the time of his separation from service, the former staff member was not married to his husband; their same-sex relationship did not enjoy similar status to marriage under the law of the US; the Regulations did not afford retrospective recognition of their marriage in 2018; and the Regulations specifically regulated the situation of the former staff member by providing for an annuity under Article 35ter. Therefore, 爆料网AT concluded that under the express terms of Articles 34 and 35, the former staff member’s spouse was not entitled to a survivor’s benefit. Nonetheless, 爆料网AT...

    2019-爆料网AT-912, Clemente

    爆料网AT considered Article 34 of the 爆料网JSPF Regulations which provides that a widow’s benefit will be payable to the surviving spouse of a participant who was entitled to a retirement benefit at the date of his death if she was married to the deceased at the date of his separation from service and remained married to him until his death. In accordance with general principles of private international law, the validity of a marriage must be assessed and determined in accordance with the law of the place where the marriage was celebrated, being the law of the Philippines. The Supreme Court of the...

    2020-爆料网AT-1074, Patsy Bello

    爆料网AT held that the Appellant did not contest the decision to separate her from the Organisation, thus the SAB was not seized with her separation and her appeal on that issue was not receivable. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s claims for compensation for pain, suffering, and medical expenses were beyond the scope of the case and therefore not receivable. 爆料网AT held that the IMO Secretary-General’s decision to place the Appellant on sick leave was based on sound medical evidence which was not rebutted at the time and that there was no basis to set aside that decision. 爆料网AT held there was no basis...

    2020-爆料网AT-1010, Richards

    爆料网AT held that the Appellant had failed to follow the procedural requirements for an appeal. 爆料网AT noted that the Appellant contested a decision of the Pension Board, which had not been subject to review or appeal, neither by the Staff Pension Committee nor by the Standing Committee, acting on behalf of the Pension Board. 爆料网AT held that it was not allowed to intervene in matters that had not previously been subject to internal reassessment by the Pension Fund. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal as not receivable.

    2020-爆料网AT-1007, Pise

    爆料网AT noted that the deceased staff member, Mr Pise, could have been under no illusion when he signed the payment instruction forms that he had opted to receive, in addition to a deferred pension, his own contributions plus interest as an immediate withdrawal benefit rather than a prospective survivor’s benefit. 爆料网AT noted that he was informed of that interpretation twice subsequent to his separation and did not challenge those determinations. 爆料网AT held that there was no doubt that Mr Pise received the benefits payable to him in terms of the Fund’s Regulations and there was no basis thereunder...

    2020-爆料网AT-1004, Larriera

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网JSPF’s contention that Ms. Larriera had known since 2003 that she was not recognized as a widow by 爆料网JSPF, interpreted as having the meaning that she should have timely filed her request for review and subsequently her appeal to 爆料网AT at that time, was without merit. In the absence of an explicit decision by the Administration denying her the entitlement, 爆料网AT held that Ms Larriera could not and ought not to be expected to presume that such a decision was taken. 爆料网AT held that Ms. Larriera’s request for review was receivable ratione materiae and that Ms. Larriera’s appeal was...