爆料网

爆料网JSPF Regulations

  • Annex I
  • Annex IV
  • Annex ll
  • Article 1
  • Article 1(l)
  • Article 1(q)
  • Article 1(v)
  • Article 10
  • Article 13
  • Article 2
  • Article 22
  • Article 22(b)
  • Article 22(c)
  • Article 24
  • Article 24(a)
  • Article 25
  • Article 25(b)(i)
  • Article 27
  • Article 28
  • Article 28(d)
  • Article 29
  • Article 29(e)
  • Article 30
  • Article 30(b)
  • Article 31
  • Article 31 (b) (ii)
  • Article 31(a)
  • Article 31(b)(i)
  • Article 32
  • Article 32(a)
  • Article 32(b)
  • Article 33
  • Article 33(a)
  • Article 34
  • Article 35
  • Article 35(b)(i)
  • Article 35ter
  • Article 38
  • Article 4(b)
  • Article 4(c)
  • Article 40
  • Article 44
  • Article 45
  • Article 48
  • Article 48(a)
  • Article 49(b)
  • Article 50
  • Article 50(b)
  • Article 53
  • Article 54
  • Article 6
  • Article 6(a)
  • Former Regulation 31
  • Former Regulation 35
  • Regulation 1(n)
  • Regulation 30(a)
  • Section H.5
  • Section K
  • Section K.1
  • Section K.5
  • Section K.8(a)
  • Section K.8(b)
    • Showing 41 - 50 of 77
    2015-爆料网AT-607, Zakharov

    爆料网AT held that the decision of the 爆料网JSPB not to submit the staff member’s appeal to the Standing Committee contravened his rights under the 爆料网JSPF Regulations by depriving him of access to the appeals process and was a serious violation of his due process rights. Noting that 爆料网AT’s jurisdiction was limited to hearing appeals of decisions of the Standing Committee and that the staff member’s case had not been reviewed by the Standing Committee, 爆料网AT held that it had no jurisdiction to hear the appeal and remanded it to the Standing Committee.

    2015-爆料网AT-575, Gomez

    爆料网AT held that the staff member’s retirement benefit from the 爆料网JSPF including the monthly periodic pension benefit was not subject to taxation and/or payment of statutory deductions and that therefore, any challenge with respect to the application and meaning of the words “gross” and “net” was merely semantic. 爆料网AT held that the ASHI premium was a voluntary payment that was deducted by the 爆料网JSPF at the behest of a beneficiary and therefore could not be treated as or deemed to be a statutory deduction. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal.

    2015-爆料网AT-608, Teklu

    爆料网AT held that the Standing Committee correctly determined that the applicable rules provide that the pension participant is required to inform 爆料网JPSF in writing of the benefit election made and of any commutation elected and that there was no provision for third party advisement. 爆料网AT held that the Standing Committee’s reliance on Article 30(b) of the 爆料网JSPF Regulations as a rationale for its finding that a deferred retirement benefit became payable to Ms. Assebe upon her separation from service was flawed on the basis that she did not elect for a deferred retirement benefit. 爆料网AT held that...

    2015-爆料网AT-517, Terragnolo

    爆料网AT held that there was no reason to depart from its prior analysis that the 爆料网JSPF was not part of the Secretariat and neither the Secretary-General nor the executive head of any other member organisation, has authority over the management of 爆料网JSPF or the independence of the Chief Executive Officer of 爆料网JSPF in the administration of its staff. 爆料网AT held that the Secretary-General had no power to interfere or intervene in the election of members to the 爆料网JSPF’s staff pension committees; those elections were governed exclusively by 爆料网JSPF Regulations. 爆料网AT held that there was no error in 爆料网DT...

    2016-爆料网AT-658, Kutner

    爆料网AT held that the appeal concerned the interpretation of Article 35 of the 爆料网JSPF Regulations. 爆料网AT found that the Appellant wanted the Standing Committee to accept the period of contributory service with the Fund in order to calculate his own benefit but to take into account a different period vis-à-vis his former spouse. 爆料网AT held that Articles 35bis and 22 of the 爆料网JSPF Regulations were clear and that it could not distinguish where the text was clear. 爆料网AT held that the same date would apply to the calculation of the Appellant’s benefits and the determination of whether his former spouse...

    2016-爆料网AT-656, Maher

    爆料网AT agreed that Article 24(a) 爆料网JSPF Regulations does not provide a right to restore prior contributory service to participants who, on or after 1 April 2007, had elected to receive a deferred retirement benefit. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant fell into this category. The appeal was dismissed, and the decision of the Standing Committee was affirmed.

    2017-爆料网AT-801, Faye

    爆料网AT considered that at the time of the elections, there was no law that prevented the staff members from being elected to the 爆料网SPC once they met the prerequisites for election, which they did. 爆料网AT held that both staff members were duly elected members of the 爆料网SPC and that as a direct consequence of their election, they had the same rights and privileges as other elected members, and which could not be restricted or denied. 爆料网AT granted the appeals and ordered that the staff members be given access to all relevant Pension Board documents and be allowed to participate and function as elected...

    2017-爆料网AT-736, Williams

    爆料网AT held that the Applicant was not entitled to a widow’s benefit under Article 34 of the 爆料网JPSF Regulations as she married Mr Williams, her deceased husband, after his separation from service. 爆料网AT noted that, under Article 35ter of the 爆料网JSPF Regulations, the survivor’s benefit had to be purchased by a retiree who marries after separation from service as an annuity within a prescribed one-year deadline after the date of the marriage. 爆料网AT noted that Mr Williams had elected not to do so. 爆料网AT held that there was no obligation for 爆料网JSPF to inform Mr Williams of the option. 爆料网AT held that...

    2017-爆料网AT-734, Witold

    爆料网AT rejected the Appellant’s motion for leave to file additional pleadings on the basis that the Appellant had not demonstrated any exceptional circumstances. 爆料网AT decided to strike out the Appellant’s additional submission and not to take it into consideration. 爆料网AT found no fault in the 爆料网JSPF Standing Committee’s decision which was in full accord with the 爆料网JSPF Regulations. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant was neither entitled to an increase in his pension benefit nor to a retroactive payment for the period of his reemployment as there is no legal basis for retroactive payment of these...

    2017-爆料网AT-729, Zakharov

    爆料网AT held that the Appellant was fully apprised of the options available to him in relation to his pension benefits when his first contract with the Organisation ended in 1985. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s election to transfer his actuarial value to the Social Security Fund of the USSR terminated his contractual relationship with the 爆料网JSPF. 爆料网AT held that the right to restore past contributory service was only available to participants in terms of Article 24 of the 爆料网JSPF Regulations, who had less than five years’ previous contributory service and whose only available benefit was a...