爆料网

爆料网DT Statute

  • Article 1
  • Article 10
  • Article 10.2
  • Article 10.3
  • Article 10.4
  • Article 10.5
  • Article 10.5(a)
  • Article 10.5(b)
  • Article 10.6
  • Article 10.7
  • Article 10.8
  • Article 10.9
  • Article 105
  • Article 11
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 11.2
  • Article 11.2(c)
  • Article 11.3
  • Article 11.4
  • Article 11.5
  • Article 11.6
  • Article 12
  • Article 12.1
  • Article 12.2
  • Article 12.3
  • Article 12.4
  • Article 12.5
  • Article 15.7
  • Article 18.2
  • Article 18.3
  • Article 19
  • Article 2
  • Article 2.1
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 2.1(b)
  • Article 2.1(c)
  • Article 2.1(d)
  • Article 2.1(e)
  • Article 2.2
  • Article 2.3
  • Article 2.4
  • Article 2.5
  • Article 2.6
  • Article 2.7
  • Article 2.7(b)
  • Article 2.8
  • Article 2(a)
  • Article 2(b)
  • Article 3
  • Article 3.1
  • Article 3.1(a)
  • Article 3.1(b)
  • Article 3.1(c)
  • Article 32
  • Article 4.2
  • Article 4.5
  • Article 4.9
  • Article 6
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.2(e)
  • Article 7.2(h)
  • Article 7.2(i)
  • Article 7.5
  • Article 7(b)
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.1(a)
  • Article 8.1(a)
  • Article 8.1(b)
  • Article 8.1(b)(ii)
  • Article 8.1(c)
  • Article 8.1(d)
  • Article 8.1(d)(i)
  • Article 8.1(d)(i)–(iv)
  • Article 8.1(d)(i)(a)
  • Article 8.1(d)(i)(b)
  • Article 8.1(d)(ii)
  • Article 8.1(d)(iii)
  • Article 8.1(d)(iv)
  • Article 8.1(i)
  • Article 8.1(i)(b)
  • Article 8.1(ii)
  • Article 8.1(ii)(c)
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.2(b)
  • Article 8.2(d)(i)
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 8.3(a)
  • Article 8.4
  • Article 8.5
  • Article 8.6
  • Article 8(a)
  • Article 8(c)
  • Article 8(d)(i)
  • Article 8(d)(ii)
  • Article 9
  • Article 9.1
  • Article 9.1
  • Article 9.1(b)
  • Article 9.2
  • Article 9.3
  • Article 9.4
  • Article 9.4
  • Article 9.4
    • Showing 581 - 590 of 1867
    2017-爆料网AT-763, Crotty

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that the decision to terminate Mr. Crotty due to abolition of post was never implemented because he obtained another position with the Organisation and that this rendered moot the Administration’s decision to terminate him. 爆料网AT held that the administrative decision was no longer a live issue and 爆料网DT was not competent to pass judgment on the application. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT made an error of law when it found Mr. Crotty’s application receivable. 爆料网AT held that in light of 爆料网DT’s error in receiving the application, the 爆料网DT’s...

    2017-爆料网AT-764, Zachariah

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held the 爆料网DT correctly determined that Mr. Zachariah was challenging an administrative decision that produced direct legal consequences affecting his employment. 爆料网AT held that there was no merit to the complaint that 爆料网DT erred in law and exceeded its jurisdiction by considering matters beyond the scope of Mr. Zachariah’s request for management evaluation and the Management Evaluation Unit’s response, on the basis that it was the role of 爆料网DT to adequately interpret and comprehend the application and that 爆料网DT had the inherent power to...

    2017-爆料网AT-765, Fasanella

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held the 爆料网DT correctly determined that Mr Fasanella was affecting an administrative decision that produced direct legal consequences affecting his employment. 爆料网AT held that there was no merit to the complaint that 爆料网DT erred in law and exceeded its jurisdiction by considering matters beyond the scope of Mr Fasanella’s request for management evaluation and the Management Evaluation Unit’s response, on the basis that it was the role of 爆料网DT to adequately interpret and comprehend the application and that 爆料网DT had the inherent power to...

    2017-爆料网AT-766, Alsado

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that the decision to terminate Mr Alsado due to abolition of post was never implemented because he obtained another position with the Organisation and that this rendered moot the Administration’s decision to terminate him. 爆料网AT held that the administrative decision was no longer a live issue and 爆料网DT was not competent to pass judgment on the application. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT made an error of law when it found Mr Alsado’s application receivable. 爆料网AT held that in light of the 爆料网DT’s error in receiving the application, the 爆料网DT’s...

    2017-爆料网AT-767, Wright

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that the decision to terminate Mr Wright’s permanent appointment was never implemented because he obtained another position with the Organisation and that this rendered moot the Administration’s decision to terminate him. 爆料网AT held that the administrative decision was no longer a live issue and 爆料网DT was not competent to pass judgment on the application. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT made an error of law when it found Mr Wright’s application receivable. 爆料网AT held that in light of the 爆料网DT’s error in receiving the application, the 爆料网DT’s...

    2017-爆料网AT-762, Lemmonier

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. On the issue of receivability, contrary to Mr Lemonnier’s contention that the Secretary-General’s appeal is not receivable because the impugned judgment did not award him any damages and was mere “a moral victory”, 爆料网AT held that success before 爆料网DT depends on whether the staff member’s application is granted, in whole or in part, not on the remedy afforded to the staff member, and that the staff member may prevail or succeed on his claim(s) without receiving an award of damages. According to 爆料网AT, as the unsuccessful party before 爆料网DT, the...

    2018-爆料网AT-895, Belkhabbaz (formerly Oummih)

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that the Secretary-General’s submissions were valid in most aspects. 爆料网AT held that the award of 21 months’ compensation was excessive as it was not reasonable to assume that Ms Belkhabbaz’s fixed-term appointment would have been extended for longer than one year, finding that an award of 12 months’ remuneration would be adequate compensation. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT exceeded its competence and erred in law by awarding pecuniary damages relating to Applicant’s placement on sick leave with half pay. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred by awarding...

    2018-爆料网AT-882, Rehman

    The Appellant sought an order for reinstatement, an increase in the compensation awarded, and an increase in the amount awarded by 爆料网DT for moral damages. The Appellant also contested the failure 爆料网DT’s failure to make a referral for accountability to the Secretary-General under Article 10(8) of the 爆料网DT Statute. 爆料网AT decided that Article 10(5)(a) of the 爆料网DT Statute, which corresponds to Article 9 (1)(a) of the 爆料网AT Statute, does not confer on the Tribunal the power to enforce the reinstatement of a staff member’s contract in a non-renewal case. 爆料网AT, therefore, held that the Appellant’s...

    2018-爆料网AT-889, Sall

    爆料网AT considered the appeal of the Appellant and the cross-appeal of the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT denied the Appellant’s request for an oral hearing, noting that it would not have added any further value or clarification of the factual and legal issues. 爆料网AT held that the Secretary-General's cross-appeal was receivable, according to Article 9(4) of the RoP. 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT erred in holding that the disciplinary investigation was flawed by procedural irregularities. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in finding that the disciplinary decision was unlawful and, accordingly, that there could neither...

    2018-爆料网AT-885, Rehman

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erroneously awarded the Appellant moral damages because she did not produce any corroborating evidence to support the contention that harm had occurred. However, 爆料网AT held that the award for moral damages would stand since the Secretary-General had not appealed the 爆料网DT judgment. 爆料网AT held that there is no corroborating evidence to support the Appellant’s claim for damages to “restore her professional, physical and emotional suffering” and for “irregularities and ignorance. ” The appeal could not succeed on those claims. 爆料网AT also held that a referral for accountability is...