爆料网

爆料网DT RoP

  • Article 10
  • Article 10.1
  • Article 10.5(b)
  • Article 11
  • Article 11.2
  • Article 11.2(a)
  • Article 11.2(c)
  • Article 12
  • Article 12.1
  • Article 13
  • Article 13.1
  • Article 13.2
  • Article 13.3
  • Article 13.4
  • Article 14
  • Article 14.1
  • Article 14.4
  • Article 15
  • Article 15.1
  • Article 15.13
  • Article 15.2
  • Article 15.3
  • Article 15.4
  • Article 15.5
  • Article 15.6
  • Article 15.7
  • Article 16
  • Article 16.1
  • Article 16.2
  • Article 16.3
  • Article 16.6
  • Article 17
  • Article 17.1
  • Article 17.2
  • Article 17.3
  • Article 17.5
  • Article 17.6
  • Article 17.6
  • Article 18
  • Article 18.1
  • Article 18.2
  • Article 18.3
  • Article 18.4
  • Article 18.5
  • Article 19
  • Article 19.1
  • Article 2
  • Article 2.1(a)
  • Article 20
  • Article 21
  • Article 22
  • Article 24
  • Article 24.1
  • Article 24.2
  • Article 24.3
  • Article 25
  • Article 26
  • Article 26.2
  • Article 27
  • Article 27.1
  • Article 27.2
  • Article 27.2(c)
  • Article 28
  • Article 28.2
  • Article 29
  • Article 29.1
  • Article 29.2
  • Article 30
  • Article 31
  • Article 31.1
  • Article 32
  • Article 32.2
  • Article 34
  • Article 34(a)
  • Article 34(b)
  • Article 35
  • Article 36
  • Article 36.1
  • Article 4.7
  • Article 5.2
  • Article 6.2
  • Article 7
  • Article 7.1
  • Article 7.1(a)
  • Article 7.1(b)
  • Article 7.1(c)
  • Article 7.2
  • Article 7.3
  • Article 7.4
  • Article 7.5
  • Article 7.6
  • Article 7(a)
  • Article 7(b)
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.1
  • Article 8.2
  • Article 8.2(c)
  • Article 8.2(e)
  • Article 8.2(g)
  • Article 8.3
  • Article 8.4
  • Article 8.6
  • Article 8(d)(i)
  • Article 9
    • Showing 161 - 170 of 671
    2012-爆料网AT-234, Gehr

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had correctly found that the alignment policy constituted an organisational measure aimed at simplifying administrative procedures in relation to staff appointments at 爆料网ODC. 爆料网AT agreed with 爆料网DT that, as a result of the Secretary-General’s broad discretion in relation to decisions on internal management, the issuance of the policy by a “Message of the Day” was subject to limited review by the Tribunal. 爆料网AT affirmed 爆料网DT’s finding that the Appellant had failed to demonstrate that the application of the alignment policy to his case was motivated by improper motives and...

    2012-爆料网AT-255, Igunda

    爆料网AT considered an appeal against 爆料网DT Orders No. 082 (NBI/2011) and No. 083 (NBI/2011) by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that the main motivation for ordering the suspension of action in Order No. 82 was to grant access to justice to the staff member and that the Order could be sustained because a certain degree of discretion had to be awarded to 爆料网DT to consider and resolve urgent matters such as interim measures. On Order No. 83, which extended the suspension of action until 12 August 2011, in breach of the five working days restrictive period to render the decision, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT...

    2012-爆料网AT-230, Nwuke

    爆料网AT considered the Secretary-General's appeal of Order No. 081 (NBI/2011) and two appeals by Mr Nwuke against 爆料网DT Order No. 101 (NBI/2011) and judgment No. 爆料网DT/2012/002. The Secretary-General asserted that 爆料网DT exceeded its jurisdiction in ordering the suspension of a contested decision without making a finding as to whether the requirements for suspension of action under Article 2(2) of the 爆料网DT Statute had been met. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not respect the limit of five working days, as set forth in Villamoran (2011-爆料网AT-160), when it extended the suspension until 17 August 2011 when the...

    2012-爆料网AT-207, Hallal

    爆料网AT considered an appeal, in which the Appellant claimed that 爆料网DT committed procedural errors in allowing the Secretary-General to embark on a de novo fact-finding inquiry and that the disciplinary measure of separation was disproportionate. 爆料网AT held that it was within the competence of 爆料网DT to hold oral hearings as well as to order the production of evidence for fair and expeditious disposal of the proceedings. 爆料网AT held that the Administration bears the burden of establishing that the alleged misconduct, for which a disciplinary measure has been taken against a staff member, occurred and...

    2012-爆料网AT-199, Worsley

    爆料网AT considered Ms Worsley’s appeal and the Secretary-General’s cross-appeal. 爆料网AT held that there was no evidence that OSLA’s decision to not represent Ms Worsley was based on her disability. 爆料网AT noted that Ms Worsley did not show how OSLA’s actions affected her rights or her case, as she was simply repeating arguments that 爆料网DT previously considered in its judgment. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and cross-appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment with regard to its decision that the right of staff members to receive assistance from OSLA does not amount to a right to be represented by OSLA.

    2012-爆料网AT-197, Ndjadi

    爆料网AT held that the Appellant had neither standing to challenge a decision which he alleged did not comply with the stipulations of his service contract nor the right to request the implementation of an arbitration procedure before 爆料网DT. However, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had committed an error in concluding that the Appellant had manifestly abused the process. The appeal was partially upheld and the 爆料网DT judgment partially vacated regarding the payment of USD 500.00 for abuse of procedure.

    2012-爆料网AT-198, Meron

    爆料网AT noted that 爆料网DT correctly stated that the former 爆料网 Administrative Tribunal considered and rejected all of the Appellant’s other pleas and that for this reason, the matter of interest was res judicata. 爆料网AT also noted that 爆料网DT ordered the Secretary-General to make a payment of USD 25,000 as compensation for the excessive and inordinate delays and the emotional harm and to arrange for a Medical Board to consider outstanding invoices. 爆料网AT found that, as the Secretary-General did not appeal, he had therefore accepted the 爆料网DT’s decision and financial award. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT’s decision...

    2013-爆料网AT-324, El-Komy

    爆料网AT held that the exclusion of the right to appeal a decision to suspend the execution of an administrative decision constitutes an exception to the general principle of the right to appeal and must, therefore, be narrowly interpreted; 爆料网AT held that the exception applied only to jurisdictional decisions ordering the suspension of an administrative decision pending management evaluation. 爆料网AT held that no jurisdictional decision, which, as in matter before it, ordered the suspension of a contested administrative decision for a period beyond the date on which the management evaluation was...

    2013-爆料网AT-389, Reid

    爆料网AT held that, given the absolute restriction on its judicial discretion with respect to time limits, 爆料网DT ought not to have entered into a review of the possible existence of exceptional circumstances justifying an extension of the time limit. 爆料网AT held that the complaint was filed beyond the time limit for administrative review or management evaluation and beyond the threshold for receivability established by the 爆料网DT’s Statute and Rules of Procedure. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal.

    2013-爆料网AT-364, Nyambuza

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that the facts upon which the sanction was based had not been established by clear and convincing evidence, albeit for different reasons than given by 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT’s determination that the evidence from two witnesses had little probative value was correct because although written witness statements taken under oath can be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence the facts to support the dismissal of a staff member when a statement is not made under oath or affirmation, there must be some other indicia of...