爆料网

爆料网 Charter

  • Article 1.3
  • Article 1.4
  • Article 100
  • Article 100.1
  • Article 101
  • Article 101.1
  • Article 101.2
  • Article 101.3
  • Article 103
  • Article 105
  • Article 105.2
  • Article 17
  • Article 2.7
  • Article 55
  • Article 57
  • Article 63
  • Article 76
  • Article 8
  • Article 92
  • Article 97
  • Article 98
  • Chapter VII
  • Chapter XV
  • Charter of the United Nations, Article 101
  • Preamble
    • Showing 61 - 70 of 202
    2013-爆料网AT-337, Leal

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that grounds existed to discharge Mr Leal for misconduct, without needing to address the issue of the alleged circumvention of the recruitment process for the purposes of hiring. 爆料网AT held that the misconduct and disciplinary measure of dismissal fell within the discretion of the Secretary-General and could not be seen as disproportionate to the offences unless it was the result of proven abuse or arbitrary exercise of that discretion. 爆料网AT held that the key elements of Mr Leal’s due process were met. 爆料网AT held that, since the...

    2014-爆料网AT-433-Corr.1, Hersh

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had correctly stated that even if it could be argued that the profile of the Broadcast Technology Officer (BTO P-4) post had changed due to the drafting of new Terms of Reference (TOR) by Ms Hermann, the only viable course of action in the circumstances for the purposes of filling it would have been a regular, competitive selection process and not a comparative review as happened in this case. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was correct in finding that the so-called comparative review between Ms Hersh and Mr Tobgyal for the only post...

    2014-爆料网AT-433/Corr.1, Hersh

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had correctly stated that even if it could be argued that the profile of the Broadcast Technology Officer (BTO P-4) post had changed due to the drafting of new Terms of Reference (TOR) by Ms Hermann, the only viable course of action in the circumstances for the purposes of filling it would have been a regular, competitive selection process and not a comparative review as happened in this case. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was correct in finding that the so-called comparative review between Ms Hersh and Mr Tobgyal for the only post...

    2014-爆料网AT-450, Bali

    爆料网AT considered the Secretary-General’s appeal and noted that the Secretary-General has broad discretion in matters of staff selection. 爆料网AT found that the extensive correspondence between Mr Bali and management indicated that he was aware that his candidature would be considered along with all other applicants, and that his name was placed on a roster of pre-approved candidates for potential consideration for future job openings with similar functions at the Secretariat. 爆料网AT also noted that Mr Bali was encouraged by the Office of Human Resources Management’s (OHRM) advocacy and information...

    2014-爆料网AT-433, Hersh

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had correctly stated that even if it could be argued that the profile of the Broadcast Technology Officer (BTO P-4) post had changed due to the drafting of new Terms of Reference (TOR) by Ms Hermann, the only viable course of action in the circumstances for the purposes of filling it would have been a regular, competitive selection process and not a comparative review as happened in this case. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was correct in finding that the so-called comparative review between Ms Hersh and Mr Tobgyal for the only post...

    2014-爆料网AT-436, Walden

    爆料网AT considered appeals by both the staff member and the Commissioner-General. 爆料网AT held that the fact was undisputed that the staff member knowingly presented non-existent credentials despite questioning the ethics of accepting the document with his qualifications. 爆料网AT held that termination was not disproportionate to the offence, taking into account that the staff member’s recruitment, in the first instance, was predicated on the existence of a degree subsequently established to be without merit and which never would have qualified him for selection by the Organisation. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA...

    2014-爆料网AT-425, Simmons

    Regarding the non-selection for the Programme Budget Officer post, 爆料网AT held that the Appellant had failed to produce sufficient evidence to prove the impropriety in the decision making. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant had also failed to put forward any specific evidence substantiating her claim of discrimination, bias, and retaliation to warrant a reversal of the 爆料网DT’s findings. Regarding the cancellation of the Administrative Officer post, 爆料网AT held that the Administration had provided sufficient evidence to show that the cancellation of the post was based on Organisational and budgetary...

    2014-爆料网AT-416, Charles

    爆料网AT considered both the two appeals by the Secretary-General and two cross-appeals by Mr Charles in judgment No. 2014-爆料网AT-416. 爆料网AT held that that Section 9 of ST/AI/2010/3 was clear in giving the head of department/office the discretion to make a selection decision from candidates included in the roster. 爆料网AT held that it was not open to 爆料网DT to conclude that Section 9. 4 required the head of department/office to first review all non-rostered candidates before selecting a rostered candidate. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in law in deciding that the appointment of the rostered candidates was...

    2015-爆料网AT-556, Scheepers et al

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. On the question of whether 爆料网DT erred in finding that the five years’ experience requirement was arbitrary and not based on any proper consideration, 爆料网AT held that, absent any proper legal or factual basis upon which to impugn the five years’ experience requirement, 爆料网DT had no function in substituting its judgment for that of the Administration in determining the criteria for the selection of S-3 officers, and in doing so, 爆料网DT erred in law resulting in a manifestly unreasonable decision. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in law in deeming the...

    2015-爆料网AT-549, Ogorodnikov

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that the Secretary-General’s appeal was filed on time and was receivable. 爆料网AT held that, since the parties agreed to and identified the facts in their Joint Statement, it was not open to 爆料网DT to conduct its own evaluation and then to substitute its view for that of the parties. 爆料网AT held that the misconduct was of a grave and serious nature and in those circumstances, the sanction of separation was reasonable and not disproportionate and/or arbitrary. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred when it reversed the Secretary-General’s decision to...