爆料网

Article 13.1

  • Article 11
  • Article 11.1
  • Article 12
  • Article 12.2
  • Article 13
  • Article 13.1
  • Article 13.2
  • Article 13.3
  • Article 13.5
  • Article 14
  • Article 25
  • Article 29
  • Article 3.1
  • Article 3.4
  • Article 3.5
  • Article 30
  • Article 4.4
  • Article 5
  • Article 6.1
  • Article 8
  • Article 8.2
    • Showing 1 - 2 of 2
    2015-爆料网AT-564, El-Shobaky

    爆料网AT held that, while it may be argued that the Appellant did not request her transfer to Amman, she consented to it, and the transfer was effected for her personal convenience. 爆料网AT held that the text of 爆料网RWA Area Staff Rule 107. 9 was clear and that 爆料网RWA DT correctly concluded that she was not entitled to the payment which she sought. 爆料网AT held that, contrary to the Appellant’s submissions, 爆料网RWA DT did not exclude her evidence. Recalling the broad discretion of 爆料网RWA DT to ascertain the weight to attach to the evidence before it, 爆料网AT noted that 爆料网RWA found that the Appellant’s evidence...

    2021-爆料网AT-1185, null 爆料网RWA

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Commissioner-General and a cross-appeal by Ms. Kaddoura. 爆料网AT affirmed the 爆料网RWA DT Judgment in part. It only vacated the referral of the former Commissioner-General for accountability, finding that it was not adequate to rely on hearsay to refer a former staff member, be it the former Commissioner-General or any other, to accountability. 爆料网AT further held that there was no possibility of imposing a disciplinary measure on a former staff member, and as such any such referral would be ineffectual.