爆料网

Abolition of post

  • Alternative appointment
  • Nomination alternative
  • Priority consideration
  • Termination
  • Test 123
    • Showing 31 - 40 of 206
    2011-爆料网AT-142, El Khatib

    爆料网AT noted there was a pattern of withholding annual performance reports and salary increments, and that those delays were coupled with the denial of a post for which the Appellant was short-listed but was not filled prior to the Appellant’s retirement. 爆料网AT noted the Appellant was also denied his post, which was abolished due to restructuring. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant was not treated conscientiously and fairly and deserved compensation. 爆料网AT granted the appeal in part and ordered that the Appellant be paid three months’ net base salary as compensation.

    2011-爆料网AT-123, Messinger

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT correctly found that it did not have jurisdiction to conduct a de novo investigation of the Appellant’s formal complaint of harassment; rather its task was to determine if there was a proper investigation into the allegations. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT awarded adequate compensation to the Appellant for the infringement of his rights with regard to the harassment complaint. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not make any errors of procedure in deciding upon the weight to be given to written statements tendered by the Appellant. 爆料网AT held that it was not persuaded that 爆料网DT made any errors of...

    2013-爆料网AT-385, Samuel Thambiah

    爆料网AT did not accept the argument that there was no evidence to indicate that the Appellant received the letter communicating the outcome of the management evaluation on 14 July 2011, noting that 爆料网DT relied on the Appellant’s statement to ascertain that date. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant failed to show any error on 爆料网DT’s part. 爆料网AT held that the Secretary-General rightly submitted that the deadline for the Appellant to file an application with 爆料网DT was 12 October 2011, notwithstanding any ambiguity as to when she actually received the management evaluation response and the appeal failed on...

    2013-爆料网AT-377, Balinge

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err on questions of fact by ignoring or failing to examine what the Appellant considered to be evidence, which constituted mere allegations and unsubstantiated argumentation on his part. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant did not support his submission by any grounds which would bring the issue within the remit of 爆料网AT. Noting that the Appellant relied upon the statements and observations which he had brought before 爆料网DT, 爆料网AT noted that a litigant’s past allegations and arguments cannot be considered evidence per se. 爆料网AT held that it was not the task of 爆料网DT (or 爆料网AT)...

    2013-爆料网AT-281, Pacheco

    爆料网AT held that the Appellant did not identify any evidence that contradicted the findings of 爆料网DT regarding the abolition of her post. 爆料网AT recalled the broad discretion of 爆料网DT to determine the admissibility of evidence and the discretion of 爆料网DT to decide whether the presence of witnesses is required and to limit oral evidence. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant failed to demonstrate that 爆料网DT erred in declining to hear the proffered evidence. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in law in allowing testimony to be given at its hearing that was neither sworn, affirmed, nor made under a promise to tell the...

    2014-爆料网AT-430, Diallo

    爆料网AT considered the appeal and allowed it in part. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s claim that the AJAB found a series of violations of her rights as a staff member, but had not awarded commensurate compensation, had merit. 爆料网AT held that the IACO breaches identified by the AJAB were fundamental in nature, (i. e. The treating of a temporary assignment as permanent, discrimination of the staff member, failure to make good faith efforts to find alternative positions, and refusing to provide access to personnel and confidential files) and the breach itself gave rise to an award of moral damages by...

    2015-爆料网AT-602, Zamel

    爆料网AT held that the allegations of irregularity raised by the Appellant were supported by evidence. 爆料网AT noted that it was hard to comprehend how the Appellant’s post suddenly became redundant when at the same time around 75 per cent of its functions were to be transferred to a consultant. 爆料网AT further noted that even though the new organisational structure was not approved until September 2013, as early as June 2013, the abolition of the Appellant’s post had already been decided and was communicated to him by his supervisor, against whom the Appellant filed a complaint of abuse of power. 爆料网AT...

    2015-爆料网AT-592, Matadi et al

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT accepted the Secretary-General’s position that 爆料网MIL staff members were given the opportunity to comment on the proposed restructuring from the beginning of the process, and the 爆料网MIL National Staff Association representative participated in the discussion on the Guidelines for the comparative review process. 爆料网AT held that it would not speculate on the chances that each of the posts might not have been abolished if there had been consultations with the National Staff Association. 爆料网AT held that the change in the composition of the...

    2015-爆料网AT-583, Lee

    On the Appellant’s claim that 爆料网DT erred in failing to hold an oral hearing, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was in possession of the respective applications and documentation which it considered to be sufficient to make the relevant decisions to facilitate the fair and expeditious disposal of the case. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT correctly found that the Appellant did not contest an administrative decision and therefore, there was no legal basis to support the contention that she had a right to be informed of the identity of the decision-makers, noting that she had been informed on several occasions that it was...

    2015-爆料网AT-553, Dia

    Noting that that the crux of the Appellant’s appeal was that 爆料网DT erred in failing to award him moral damages by reason of the violation of his right to a fair recruitment process and a missed opportunity, 爆料网AT held there was merit to the appeal. 爆料网AT held that there was no evidence that the Appellant’s claim for moral damages was properly considered by 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT held that on the totality of the evidence, the Appellant had a claim for moral damages. 爆料网AT upheld 爆料网DT’s finding that the recruitment process was flawed in that it was affected by the perception of bias. 爆料网AT granted the appeal in...