爆料网

Procedure (first instance and 爆料网AT)

  • Admissibility of evidence
  • Case management
  • Confidentiality
  • Oral hearings
  • Production of documents
    • Showing 221 - 230 of 262
    爆料网DT/2010/080, Bertucci

    The applicant, then a staff member, applied and was short-listed for the Galaxy-advertised post of ASG/DESA. The notice stated that the candidacies of all 爆料网 staff members were to be “considered first”, that is to say, in priority to external candidates, and via a procedure akin to that of ST/AI/2006/3. The person appointed was not a 爆料网 staff member and the applicant challenged the decision to appoint them. At around the time of the applicant’s application for the post, he was the subject of various widely publicized investigations. The respondent initially claimed that the decision not to...

    爆料网DT/2010/035, Megerditchian

    In accordance with article 18, paragraph 2, of its rules of procedure, the Tribunal may order the production of evidence for either party and the parties have to provide such evidence, even though they consider it to be confidential. According to article 18, paragraph 4, of its rules of procedure, it falls upon the Tribunal to assess the confidentiality of the evidence and, if it finds the evidence to be confidential, it is the Tribunal’s responsibility to ensure that measures are taken to preserve such confidentiality. In the instant case, the Tribunal did not use the confidential documents...

    爆料网DT/2010/023, Lesar

    In cases deemed suitable to be decided by summary judgment, usually an oral hearing is not necessary. In non-disciplinary cases, it is a matter of judicial discretion to hold an oral hearing or to abstain from it. The mandate of 爆料网DT is confined to the review of administrative decisions. Although the definition of this term may be disputed, it is beyond question that administrative decisions must by essence be taken by the Administration. Since the decisions of former 爆料网AT are judicial decisions, they cannot be contested before 爆料网DT. The provisions on transitional measures apply to pending...

    爆料网DT/2010/022, Fagundes

    The mandate of 爆料网DT is confined to the review of administrative decisions. Although the definition of this term may be disputed, it is beyond question that administrative decisions must by essence be taken by the Administration. Since the decisions of former 爆料网AT are judicial decisions, they cannot be contested before 爆料网DT. The provisions on transitional measures apply to pending 爆料网AT cases only. They do not include the power to revise 爆料网AT judgements. Cases closed by judgments of former 爆料网AT are res iudicata.

    爆料网DT/2010/020, Saadeh

    The Tribunal cannot allow the Applicant’s claim to continue to “hang like the sword of Damocles” over the efficient operations of the Organization. The Applicant had failed to give instructions to his Counsel in respect of his Application. The Applicant’s Counsel’s responses show disregard for the directions from the Tribunal. The Applicant has not actively or diligently pursued his case.