爆料网

Performance management

  • Performance evaluation
  • Rebuttal
    • Showing 41 - 50 of 145
    2017-爆料网AT-715, Charot

    On the issue of 爆料网DT’s denial of the Appellant’s request for confidentiality, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err in law or fact in denying her request as if confidentiality were attached to the identity of each staff member, there would be no transparency. 爆料网AT did not admit into evidence additional documents as they were of no assistance to it and there were no exceptional circumstances. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant merely gave passing reference to the 爆料网AT Statute’s grounds of appeal and offered no legal authority to support her claims. 爆料网AT agreed with the characterization of the issue by 爆料网DT...

    2017-爆料网AT-757, Sarwar

    爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT’s determination that the decision to terminate the appointment was unlawful on account of the repeated non-compliance with ST/AI/2010/5 was formalistic. While obviously a work plan should be finalized at the beginning of a cycle, 爆料网DT held that there was nothing in ST/AI/2010/5 that held any failure to generate a work plan at the commencement of a cycle to be a procedural flaw resulting axiomatically in any subsequent decision to terminate an appointment being unlawful. Likewise, there is no such consequence for not holding a midpoint review in a timely manner. 爆料网AT...

    2018-爆料网AT-895, Belkhabbaz (formerly Oummih)

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that the Secretary-General’s submissions were valid in most aspects. 爆料网AT held that the award of 21 months’ compensation was excessive as it was not reasonable to assume that Ms Belkhabbaz’s fixed-term appointment would have been extended for longer than one year, finding that an award of 12 months’ remuneration would be adequate compensation. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT exceeded its competence and erred in law by awarding pecuniary damages relating to Applicant’s placement on sick leave with half pay. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred by awarding...

    2018-爆料网AT-868, Sarwar

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in reopening a matter that had already been the subject of a final judgment of 爆料网AT. 爆料网AT considered that 爆料网DT exceeded its competence and erred in law by making its own determination of Mr Sarwar’s harassment complaint, emphasising that the role of the Tribunal is not to substitute its own decision for that of the Administration. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred when it rescinded the contested decision to close the matter underlying the Appellant’s formal complaint, and when it ruled that there was no need for a new...

    2018-爆料网AT-866, Gnassou

    爆料网AT considered whether 爆料网DT erred in concluding that the decision not to renew the Appellant’s appointment and to separate her from service on the basis that she failed to sign the letters of appointment containing the extensions of her fixed-term appointment was lawful. 爆料网AT noted that when a performance shortcoming is identified, remedial actions may be put in place and if the shortcoming is not rectified, a PIP shall be prepared. 爆料网AT further noted that, in the absence of any explicit provision establishing otherwise, the rebuttal process does not have the effect of suspending the...

    2018-爆料网AT-865, Gnassou

    爆料网AT considered whether 爆料网DT erred in law or fact resulting in a manifestly unreasonable decision when it found that i) there was no error of procedure stemming from the delay in completing the comments on the Appellant’s rebuttal statement; and ii) the Appellant’s claim regarding the assessment and findings of the rebuttal panel together with her final performance appraisal did not result in a challengeable administrative decision. 爆料网AT found that, because no explanation was provided for the initial and relevant delay, 爆料网DT erred in concluding that the reasons given by the administration...

    2018-爆料网AT-838, Al-Ashi

    爆料网AT considered the appeal of the consolidated applications. With respect to the first issue, 爆料网AT found no error in 爆料网RWA DT’s conclusion that the Appellant had failed to establish that the decision not to confirm his appointment as TDSE Advisor and to transfer him to his previous post was unlawful. 爆料网AT noted that there was no merit in the Appellant’s contention that 爆料网RWA DT failed to examine the relevant facts and to apply legal and regulatory provisions to his performance evaluations during his probationary period. 爆料网DT also noted that the review of the Appellant’s performance assessments...

    2019-爆料网AT-951, Allen

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err that, in the circumstances of the complaints made and the importance of the Appellant’s role in a difficult duty station, the Respondent was entitled to place the Appellant on Special Leave with Pay while it investigated the allegations against him. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT ought not to have relied upon Morsy (judgment No. 2013-爆料网AT-298), Assale (judgment No. 2015-爆料网AT-534), and Sarwar (judgment No. 2017-爆料网AT-757) as it did. 爆料网AT noted that in the Appellant’s case, not only was there a performance-related justification required to be established but no proper...

    2019-爆料网AT-900, El Sadek

    With respect to the Appellant’s appeal as it pertained to his 2016 performance evaluation and OTI, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT did not err on a question of law or fact resulting in a manifestly unreasonable decision, nor did it commit an error in procedure such as to affect the outcome of the case. 爆料网AT held that the issue of the e-PERs of the other staff members was not raised before 爆料网RWA DT and, therefore, was not receivable. 爆料网AT held that the reopening of the 2016 e-PER did not affect the overall performance evaluation, which was maintained as “fully meets” expectations, and therefore this...

    2020-爆料网AT-1044, Handy

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that it was unable to detect any fault in the 爆料网DT’s conclusion that the negative narrative comments and the performance appraisal itself constituted a reviewable administrative decision. 爆料网AT held that the negative narrative comments detracted from the overall satisfactory performance appraisal of the Appellant and had present and direct legal consequences for the Appellant’s terms of appointment, thus the comments and the performance appraisal constituted a final administrative decision. 爆料网AT held that the application was...