爆料网AT took into account that the Appellant only made his request some 29 months after the expiration of the deadline and that he did not submit any medical report. 爆料网AT held that the appeal was not receivable. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and upheld the 爆料网JSPB decision.
爆料网AT held that the Appellant had failed to seek administrative review of the contested decision before launching an appeal with the Joint Appeals Board (JAB). 爆料网AT held that those steps had to have been exhausted before invoking the jurisdiction of 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in considering that the decision of 10 October 2008 was merely a confirmation of an earlier decision. 爆料网AT held that the decision of 10 October 2008 was a new administrative decision for which the Applicant did not seek administrative review. 爆料网AT noted that 爆料网DT has no jurisdiction to waive the requirement of a prior...
爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that it was not for the head of department to intervene in the evaluation process conducted by the programme manager, the Central Review Body and, where applicable, the panel. 爆料网AT held that the head of department is not entitled to drop a candidate from the list of qualified candidates and, consequently, from the roster of candidates who have been recognised as qualified. 爆料网AT held that the Executive Director’s actions disregarded Mr Verschur’s right to benefit from the advantage of being included on the roster for a year and she...
爆料网AT noted that, in finding the application to be time-barred, 爆料网DT considered whether any exceptional circumstances existed to allow a waiver of the time limits and found that neither health problems nor the need to replace counsel constituted justification in the specific circumstances of the case. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant failed to demonstrate any error warranting the reversal of the first instance judgment, whose conclusions it endorsed, as they relied on a correct application of the law. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment.
爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General of the Compensation Case, an appeal by Mr Shkurtaj of the Ethics Policy Case, and a cross-appeal by Mr Shkurtaj of the Compensation Case. 爆料网AT held that a former staff member has standing to contest an administrative decision concerning him or her if the facts giving rise to his or her complaint arose from his or her employment and that there must be sufficient nexus between the former employment and the impugned action. 爆料网AT held that an award for damages was justified in the circumstances. 爆料网AT held that the amount of fourteen months’ net...
爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT correctly held that the Appellant’s case was not receivable. 爆料网AT held that a selection process involved a series of steps or findings which led to the administrative decision, and that these steps may only be challenged in the context of an appeal against the outcome of the selection process, but cannot alone be the subject of an appeal to the 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT’s decision to order the Appellant to pay the sum of CHF 2,000, was justified because he filed a frivolous application and made all kinds of baseless charges against the fairness of the 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT...
爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err when it decided that the present appeal by a former staff member to have access to the 爆料网OV premises was not among the listed grounds of jurisdiction of the 爆料网DT and was therefore not receivable. 爆料网DT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment.
爆料网AT affirmed the decision of 爆料网DT that the Appellant’s adverse performance appraisals constituted a proper basis for the non-renewal of his fixed-term appointment. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err in limiting the scope of his application to the non-renewal. 爆料网AT concurred with the former 爆料网 Administrative Tribunal which held that unless the Administration made an express promise creating an expectancy of renewal, or unless it abused its discretion, or was motivated by discriminatory or improper grounds in not extending the appointment, the non-renewal of a staff member’s fixed-term appointment...
爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that the head of department was not entitled to drop a candidate from the list of qualified candidates and, consequently, from the roster of candidates who had been recognised as qualified. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not commit an error of law or fact in ruling that the contested administrative decision was marred by irregularity and ordering the Appellant to be paid compensation equivalent to six months’ base salary as an alternative to the rescission of the improper decision. 爆料网AT considered that, in this matter, the first judge was...
As a preliminary issue, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err in declining to hear the proffered evidence from witnesses for the Appellant, as the testimonies related to facts that were not specifically in dispute and could not have refuted the uncontested fact that the decision had been confirmed. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant failed to demonstrate that 爆料网DT erred in concluding that the confirmation decision was lawful and in awarding her compensation only in the amount of the Special Post Allowance she would have received. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err by failing to order the Appellant’s...
