爆料网

爆料网AT

Showing 451 - 460 of 1669
2022-爆料网AT-1230, Ratnanjali Koduru

Ms. Koduru appealed. 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT did not err in law or fact in concluding that Ms. Koduru’s case was fully and fairly considered. Specifically, 爆料网AT found no error in the 爆料网DT’s finding that Ms. Koduru had failed to meet the burden of proof that the decision was based on ulterior motives and a protracted pattern of harassment, as well as to establish a causal link between the alleged incidents and the challenged administrative decision not to renew her fixed-term appointment. Rather, such a decision, as correctly determined by the 爆料网DT, was a reasonable and proper exercise of the...

2022-爆料网AT-1229, Jolanta Wozniak

爆料网AT dismissed the appeal. 爆料网AT held that 25 July 2017 was the relevant date triggering the time limit under Staff Rule 11.2(c). On that date, Ms. Wozniak was informed in unequivocal terms by the Administration that her request for deferment for the 2017 Rotation Exercise had been approved on retirement ground, on the understanding that she would retire on 30 April 2019. Thus, her request for management evaluation dated 24 July 2019 was filed outside the 60-day statutory time limit. 爆料网AT found that in any case the 爆料网DT also correctly held that even if it were to entertain that the...

2022-爆料网AT-1228, Sarah Coleman

Ms. Coleman filed an appeal against the 爆料网DT Judgment asking that 爆料网AT reverse the 爆料网DT findings that (i) the failure to answer Ms. Coleman’s repeated requests for information about her case did not amount to a procedural violation; (ii) Ms. Coleman had failed to provide proof of bias or prejudice; (iii) she was not entitled to moral damages. 爆料网AT found that the specific grounds of appeal under (i) and (ii) were devoid of any practicality as, even if they were to be accepted by the Appeals Tribunal as legally and factually true, this would not lead to a different ruling having an actual, real...

2022-爆料网AT-1226, null Secretary-General

The Secretary-General appealed. 爆料网AT found "questionable" the 爆料网DT’s finding that the investigation reports were not thorough or procedurally fair. 爆料网AT was satisfied that the manner in which the inquiry was conducted was adequate for the purposes of a preliminary assessment. 爆料网AT found that in view of the fact that Ms. Rehman was not given or entitled to the reports, the impugned order of the 爆料网DT essentially required the OIAI to provide a written, reasoned decision setting out the findings and reasons for its assessment that the complaints should not be referred to an investigation. The...

2022-爆料网AT-1225, Sarah Coleman

Ms. Coleman appealed. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT Judgment. 爆料网AT noted that in reaching its conclusion that it was reasonable for the Administration to decide that it was not in the interest of the Organization to keep Ms. Coleman on pay status whilst not performing work until the expiry of her fixed-term appointment, the 爆料网DT considered, inter alia, that: i) she had placed herself in a situation in which she could no longer perform her duties in Pakistan; ii) she had rejected the temporary assignment offered to her in South Soudan; and iii) she was not interested in...

2022-爆料网AT-1224, Howard Andrew Giles

爆料网AT considered an application for revision of Judgment No. 2021-爆料网AT-1106. With reference to Article 11 of the 爆料网AT Statute, 爆料网AT held that it was neither satisfied that the blank tax returns as provided by Mr. Giles’ were unknown to the 爆料网AT and to the party applying for the revision at the time the relevant Judgment was rendered nor that the blank tax returns were a decisive fact. 爆料网AT held that the Applicant reiterated arguments he had made previously, which was not the purpose nor intention of an application for revision of judgment. 爆料网AT dismissed the application for revision.

2022-爆料网AT-1223, Cristina Silva

爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General and a cross-appeal by Ms. Silva. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT committed several errors of law and fact and the decision to reassign Ms. Silva was without procedural flaws. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网AT’s jurisprudence does not establish a need for prior consultation for every reassignment. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had an incorrect understanding of the contested administrative decision. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred when it held that the reassignment decision should have been notified in formal writing as it significantly altered Ms. Silva’s terms and conditions of...

2022-爆料网AT-1222, Ahmad Mudardas

爆料网AT affirmed the 爆料网RWA DT Judgment. Regarding the deduction of a sum of money from his separation benefits, 爆料网AT agreed that this claim was not first submitted for decision review. Regarding his separation from service without termination indemnity, 爆料网AT also found no error in the 爆料网RWA DT Judgment. The Tribunal agreed with the 爆料网RWA DT that the bank statement did not contain the correct amount and that the invoices he submitted did not relate to genuine purchases. 爆料网AT was satisfied that: (i) the facts on which the disciplinary measure was based had been established by clear and convincing...

2022-爆料网AT-1221, Secretary-General

爆料网AT first explained that under the new reimbursement regime, an expense would be recoverable if: (i) it’s for tuition; (ii) it is paid directly to the school; and (iii) it is certified by the school as being necessary for attendance. 爆料网AT rejected the staff member’s claim that because another 爆料网 entity would apply a rule more favorably to his case, that entity’s interpretation should trump over the one given by the organization where he actually works. Second, 爆料网AT disagreed with the Administration’s approach that if an item in a category of fees was inadmissible, then the Administration...

2022-爆料网AT-1219, Ashraf Zaqqout

爆料网AT held that the determination of the Director of the Ethics Office that no retaliation had occurred constituted an administrative decision that went directly to the merits of the case and could not be subject to an interlocutory appeal. 爆料网AT held that the appeal against the 爆料网RWA DT order for production of document was not receivable, because it was interrelated to the alleged lack of jurisdiction. Noting that the Appellant would not be able to raise his issues in an appeal against the final judgment, as he did not file an application to 爆料网RWA DT and 爆料网RWA DT had not issued a judgment, 爆料网AT...