爆料网

爆料网AT

Showing 1021 - 1030 of 1669
2015-爆料网AT-574, Couquet

爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in concluding that the staff member’s eligibility for ASHI should be determined based on the date of her recruitment to the ICTY in October 2006 instead of her appointment to 爆料网AKRT in October 2009. 爆料网AT noted that, under Staff Rule 4. 17, the date of recruitment that is relevant for determining the terms of appointment of a former staff member who receives a new appointment after separating from the Organisation is the date of the new appointment. In the staff member’s case, her new appointment with 爆料网AKRT was a re...

2015-爆料网AT-608, Teklu

爆料网AT held that the Standing Committee correctly determined that the applicable rules provide that the pension participant is required to inform 爆料网JPSF in writing of the benefit election made and of any commutation elected and that there was no provision for third party advisement. 爆料网AT held that the Standing Committee’s reliance on Article 30(b) of the 爆料网JSPF Regulations as a rationale for its finding that a deferred retirement benefit became payable to Ms. Assebe upon her separation from service was flawed on the basis that she did not elect for a deferred retirement benefit. 爆料网AT held that...

2015-爆料网AT-558, Kouadio

爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General and a cross-appeal by Mr Kouadio. 爆料网AT noted that at no point did Mr Kouadio request management evaluation of the contested decision and that 爆料网DT is prohibited from considering any application brought to it more than three years after the issuance of the administrative decision that a potential applicant is seeking to challenge. 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT erred on a question of law in finding that it could not determine the receivability of the application. 爆料网AT upheld the Secretary-General’s appeal, vacated the 爆料网DT judgment and dismissed Mr...

2015-爆料网AT-559, Khan

爆料网AT held, in agreement with 爆料网DT, that the decision of 23 April 2013 when the Appellant was informed that his post would be abolished on 31 December 2013, constituted the contested administrative decision in the case. 爆料网AT agreed with the Appellant that, in its Order No. 98 (NY/2014), 爆料网DT made no reference to considering receivability as a preliminary issue, however, 爆料网AT held that the Appellant did not establish that such an error resulted in a manifestly unreasonable decision or had any effect at all on the decision. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s claim that he did not receive a fair trial...

2015-爆料网AT-560, Staedtler

爆料网AT considered an interlocutory appeal against Order No. 116 and Order No. 126 by Mr Staedler. Regarding Order No. 116, Mr Staedler requested that the Order be rescinded, that Order No. 078 (NBI/2014) be reinstated, and that the Secretary-General’s reply be stricken as untimely. Regarding Order No. 126, Mr Staedler requested that the portion of the Order admonishing him be rescinded and that the Order not be published in its present form. On Mr Staedler’s contention that 爆料网AT should receive the appeal because it was an exceptional case in which 爆料网DT exceeded its jurisdiction or competence...

2015-爆料网AT-561, Pirraku

爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT affirmed, albeit on different grounds, the 爆料网DT award of compensation to Mr Pirraku. 爆料网AT observed that the issues surrounding Mr Pirraku’s non-promotion should not have been presented to, or addressed by, 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT held that the issues regarding Mr Pirraku’s non-promotion were the subject of a settlement and release agreement reached through mediation and, as such, were not subject to judicial review. 爆料网AT held that the issue for 爆料网DT’s determination was the execution of the settlement agreement. 爆料网AT held that the issues of...

2015-爆料网AT-562, Birya

爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that the decision to set up a fact-finding panel was not, in and of itself, a decision relating to the contractual rights of a staff member. 爆料网AT held that such a decision was preliminary in nature and irregularities in connection with that decision, including alleged delay in reaching that decision, may only be challenged in the context of an appeal after the conclusion of the entire process. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT’s conclusion that the application was receivable was without legal basis as was its award of compensation. 爆料网AT held that...

2015-爆料网AT-563, Reid

爆料网AT noted that the Appellant was not bringing a claim that he did not receive the benefits and entitlements which pertained to a temporary appointment, but rather his allegation was that the General Assembly resolutions which gave rise to the rules and administrative issuances regulating his employment did not adhere to the principle of equal pay for equal work and were contrary to a myriad of international human rights instruments to which the Organisation was bound to adhere. 爆料网AT held that the policy change for staff members on temporary contracts was binding on the Secretary-General, who...

2015-爆料网AT-564, El-Shobaky

爆料网AT held that, while it may be argued that the Appellant did not request her transfer to Amman, she consented to it, and the transfer was effected for her personal convenience. 爆料网AT held that the text of 爆料网RWA Area Staff Rule 107. 9 was clear and that 爆料网RWA DT correctly concluded that she was not entitled to the payment which she sought. 爆料网AT held that, contrary to the Appellant’s submissions, 爆料网RWA DT did not exclude her evidence. Recalling the broad discretion of 爆料网RWA DT to ascertain the weight to attach to the evidence before it, 爆料网AT noted that 爆料网RWA found that the Appellant’s evidence...

2015-爆料网AT-573, Walden

爆料网AT considered a request for revision of judgment No. 2014-爆料网AT-436 as well as a motion requesting that 爆料网AT strike certain paragraphs from it. 爆料网AT held that the request did not fulfil the statutory requirements and constituted, in fact, a disguised attempt to re-open the case. 爆料网AT held that his application was not receivable. 爆料网AT dismissed the application for revision.