爆料网

English

Showing 1651 - 1660 of 4321
2017-爆料网AT-777, Faust

爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s fixed-term appointment was lawfully terminated in accordance with the amended terms of her appointment and that her appeal had no merit. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant failed to meet the burden of proof of the alleged improper motivation for the decision. 爆料网AT noted that 爆料网FCCC advertised nine fixed-term positions at the G-5 level, but that the Appellant did not apply for any of them, her aim being to secure a P-2 level position. 爆料网AT found no fault in 爆料网DT’s conclusion that the Administration had no duty to seek a suitable position for the Applicant beyond the...

2017-爆料网AT-776, Ibrahim

爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General and a cross-appeal by Mr Ibrahim. 爆料网AT held, agreeing with 爆料网DT, that there was nothing illegal or warranting compensation in the investigation process and the investigation was not vitiated by procedural error or improper motive. Accordingly, 爆料网AT dismissed the cross-appeal. 爆料网AT held that the bottle of wine disappeared immediately after Mr Ibrahim had handled it for the second time in front of the camera and then with his back obstructing the camera. 爆料网AT held that, apart from the direct link between the manipulation of the bottle of wine by...

2017-爆料网AT-771, Al-Mussader

爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT did not make any errors of law or fact in dismissing the Appellant’s application. 爆料网AT found no reason to differ from the conclusion of 爆料网RWA DT, that 爆料网RWA could not have considered the Appellant as having the requisite international experience. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT gave careful and fair consideration to the Appellant’s arguments regarding the required international experience for the post. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant failed to discharge his burden of proving through clear and convincing evidence that he was denied a fair chance of selection. 爆料网AT held that the...

2017-爆料网AT-775, Onifade

爆料网AT considered Mr Onifade’s application for revision of judgment No. 2016-爆料网AT-668. 爆料网AT held that there was no evidence before it to support the application. 爆料网AT held that Mr Onifade had failed to show that the first MOP form was unknown to him at the time the judgment was rendered and he had presented no decisive fact which was, at the time the judgment was rendered, unknown to him and 爆料网AT. 爆料网AT held that the application did not meet the criteria established under Article 11(1) of the 爆料网AT Statute and Article 24 of the 爆料网AT RoP. 爆料网AT held that the application had no merit and dismissed it...

2017-爆料网AT-736, Williams

爆料网AT held that the Applicant was not entitled to a widow’s benefit under Article 34 of the 爆料网JPSF Regulations as she married Mr Williams, her deceased husband, after his separation from service. 爆料网AT noted that, under Article 35ter of the 爆料网JSPF Regulations, the survivor’s benefit had to be purchased by a retiree who marries after separation from service as an annuity within a prescribed one-year deadline after the date of the marriage. 爆料网AT noted that Mr Williams had elected not to do so. 爆料网AT held that there was no obligation for 爆料网JSPF to inform Mr Williams of the option. 爆料网AT held that...

2017-爆料网AT-738, Bertrand

爆料网AT refused the Appellant’s application for an oral hearing. 爆料网AT held that there was nothing to support the Appellant’s submission that 爆料网DT erred in finding that he had not exercised reasonable care by expecting the same standard of care from him as from the Operations Response Unit supervisor. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT’s finding that the Appellant was not on duty at the relevant time was fully supported by the facts and was not in error. Contrary to the Appellant’s submission, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not suggest that the Appellant intended to cause the loss or foresaw the loss, nor did the...

2017-爆料网AT-737, Likukela

爆料网AT refused the Appellant’s application for an oral hearing, noting that the Appellant was not entitled to call evidence on appeal that she should have presented to 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT correctly regarded itself as not competent to make medical findings contradicting the medical evidence. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT made no error in its finding that the ABCC’s recommendation had no connection with the attempted recovery of monies which was allegedly paid to the Appellant by the United Nations Federal Credit Union (爆料网FCU) by mistake. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was quite correct in its opinion that the...

2017-爆料网AT-733, Nadeau

爆料网AT denied the Appellant’s application for an oral hearing. 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT had not committed an error of procedure by denying the Appellant an oral hearing. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT enjoys a wide margin of discretion in all matters relating to case management and there was no error in the proceedings before 爆料网DT with specific consideration of the following: 爆料网DT’s denial of the proceedings to be conducted in French; 爆料网DT’s dismissal of objections to English translations in the application and other documents, 爆料网DT’s issuance of its judgment before having the Secretary-General’s reply...

2017-爆料网AT-734, Witold

爆料网AT rejected the Appellant’s motion for leave to file additional pleadings on the basis that the Appellant had not demonstrated any exceptional circumstances. 爆料网AT decided to strike out the Appellant’s additional submission and not to take it into consideration. 爆料网AT found no fault in the 爆料网JSPF Standing Committee’s decision which was in full accord with the 爆料网JSPF Regulations. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant was neither entitled to an increase in his pension benefit nor to a retroactive payment for the period of his reemployment as there is no legal basis for retroactive payment of these...

2017-爆料网AT-735, Awe

爆料网AT considered an application for revision of judgment No. 2016-爆料网AT-667. Noting that there was no provision under its Rules of Procedure allowing for the submission of additional pleadings after the submission of comments to an application for revision of judgment and that no exceptional circumstances existed, 爆料网AT dismissed Mr Awe’s motion to file additional comments. 爆料网AT considered Mr Awe’s claim to have discovered new facts in the form of a report of the fact-finding panel which considered his complaints of abuse of authority and harassment which allegedly showed, in sum, the improper...