2010-爆料网AT-051, Ilic
爆料网AT preliminarily held that the appeal was receivable, noting that the situation was quite exceptional and a necessity to consider the disposition of facts. 爆料网AT rejected the request for discovery of evidence and an oral hearing, holding that there were no exceptional circumstances justifying the exercise of its discretion in granting such requests. On the merits, 爆料网AT held that the minutes of the recourse session held by the Appointments, Postings and Promotions Board clearly showed that the experience and achievements of the Appellant were properly considered at the 2007 Promotion Session...
2010-爆料网AT-046, Vangelova
爆料网AT rejected the request for an oral hearing finding that the issues raised on appeal did not require further clarification. 爆料网AT rejected the submission from the Secretary-General that the appeal was time-barred since the appeal was a corrected appeal and, therefore, conform to the requirements of Article 8 of the 爆料网AT RoP. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant had failed to identify one of the five grounds of appeal which could give legal basis to her appeal and that her arguments were the same made before 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant had failed to establish how 爆料网DT had erred on questions of...
2010-爆料网AT-039, Maghari
爆料网AT considered whether the Commissioner-General erred in adopting the JAB’s recommendation not to accept the Appellant’s withdrawal letter and whether the Appellant was entitled to compensation for moral and material damages. 爆料网AT referred to Jordan Field Staff Circular No. J/17/97, which provides that withdrawal of resignations will normally not be accepted unless it is evident that such withdrawal is in the sole interest of the work. 爆料网AT noted that the evidence on record revealed that the Appellant’s services were unsatisfactory. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant provided no evidence of...
2010-爆料网AT-033, Mebtouche
爆料网AT preliminarily rejected the Appellant’s request for an oral hearing via teleconference, noting that his brief of appeal was sufficient and did not require further clarification. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s contention that 爆料网DT failed to consider his arguments regarding the former service on a “specialist” post was without merit, noting that this issue was considered by 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT noted that neither 爆料网DT nor 爆料网AT has the authority to amend any regulation or rule of the Organisation, so as to apply the “case by case” consideration to “specialist” staff members during promotion sessions to...
2010-爆料网AT-022, Abu Hamda
爆料网AT noted that, when reviewing a sanction imposed by the Administration, it needed to examine whether the facts on which the sanction was based were established; whether the established facts legally amounted to misconduct; and whether the disciplinary measure applied was disproportionate to the offense. 爆料网AT affirmed the Commissioner-General’s decision to discipline the staff member for misconduct. However, in light of the mitigating factors, 爆料网AT held that the disciplinary measure was disproportionate to the offense and substituted the disciplinary measure of demotion with that of a written...
2010-爆料网AT-012, Parker
In considering the Appellant’s appeal, 爆料网AT found that the appeal was not receivable with respect to the issue of the Appellant’s non-promotion during the 2004-2005 Annual Promotion Session as the issue was not raised before 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT also found that 爆料网DT did not err in finding on the merits that the Appellant had not been subjected to harassment. 爆料网AT noted that there was a proven record of considerable efforts deployed in order to resolve the Appellant’s situation, involving the 爆料网HCR senior management at the highest level and that the High Commissioner personally met the Appellant and...
2010-爆料网AT-010, Tadonki
The Secretary-General appealed. 爆料网AT dismissed the Secretary-General’s appeal against the 爆料网DT’s interpretation of judgment. It found that the appeal was not receivable because the interpretation of a judgment is not a fresh decision or judgment within the meaning of Article 2. 1 of the 爆料网AT Statute.
2010-爆料网AT-004, Neville
爆料网AT considered the Appellant’s appeal and affirmed the decisions of 爆料网JSPB Standing Committee. 爆料网AT found that the Appellant’s first ground of appeal had no merit, noting that the Appellant had prior notice of her separation and could have exercised her right to restore her participation prior to the time of her separation in accordance with Section F. 1 of the Pension Fund’s Administrative Rules, which she failed to do. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网JSPF Standing Committee had no discretion to make an exception in this case and the Standing Committee’s decision not to restore the Appellant’s prior...