±¬ÁÏÍø

±¬ÁÏÍøDT held that the Applicant satisfied the test that the decision appeared to be prima facie unlawful. ±¬ÁÏÍøDT held that the Applicant satisfied the urgency test. ±¬ÁÏÍøDT noted that the decision would leave five days, from the date of the Judgment, for the Applicant to obtain temporary employment for a period of three months. ±¬ÁÏÍøDT held that a stay in the implementation of the decision, albeit for the limited period of an additional 25 calendar days, until the management evaluation is due on 7 November 2011, would serve the purpose of allowing sufficient time for the Respondent to carry out a proper...

±¬ÁÏÍøDT held that the impunged decision was prima facie unlawful. ±¬ÁÏÍøDT held that, in the absence of some emergency situation, the Organization must keep staff informed of changes in key legislation and with sufficient time for the staff to take steps to find alternative employment, accommodation and address their visa status, particularly where changes will affect so many staff and their families. ±¬ÁÏÍøDT held that, since the Applicant only became aware, on 27 October 2011, of a decision that would be implemented on 31 October 2011, and that the Applicant¡¯s filing of his application was prompt and...