爆料网

Full and fair consideration

  • Central Review Body
  • Décision de sélection
  • Eligibility
  • Examen complet et équitable
  • Full and fair consideration
  • Interview
  • Selection decision
  • Standard of proof
  • Written test
    • Showing 101 - 110 of 238
    2018-爆料网AT-880, Munyan

    爆料网AT considered the appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that the Secretary-General’s appeal was in direct conflict with his submissions to 爆料网DT. While the Secretary-General acknowledged procedural irregularities by the Hiring Manager to 爆料网DT, in his appeal he argued that no irregularities happened in removing the Applicant’s name from the list and that the Hiring Manager was entitled to exercise her discretion and correct her mistakes after further assessing the candidate’s qualifications. 爆料网AT held that no evidence was presented to 爆料网DT of a second assessment by the Hiring Manager or...

    2018-爆料网AT-878, Pinto

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in finding the Hiring Manuals binding on the Administration, nonetheless, confirming that the Hiring Manager’s reliance on the shortlist prepared by the CSS/OSU constituted a procedural irregularity in terms of Section 7. 4 of ST/AI/2010/3, which undisputedly enjoys binding legal authority. 爆料网AT held that such irregularities only result in the rescission of a non-selection decision or of the decision not to shortlist a candidate in case the candidate had a significant chance, which could not be verified in this case, the same logic being applicable to compensation for...

    2018-爆料网AT-876, Cardwell

    爆料网AT considered the receivability of the issue of non-renewal and whether 爆料网DT erred in rejecting the Appellant’s claim that his candidacy for the relevant post had not been given full and fair consideration. 爆料网AT referenced Staff Rule 11. 2(a), which provides that it is an established principle that a request for management evaluation is the first step in the appeal process of an administrative decision. 爆料网AT further noted that 爆料网DT has the inherent power to individualize and define the administrative decision challenged by a party and to identify the subject(s) of review. 爆料网AT found no fault...

    2018-爆料网AT-836, Loeber

    爆料网AT considered the appeal. 爆料网AT found no reason to differ from 爆料网DT’s conclusion. 爆料网AT found that the applicable procedural requirements were followed, and the evidence did not supersede the presumption of regularity of the administrative decision. 爆料网AT further noted that the Appellant was afforded full and fair consideration and that he failed to establish any bias by the members of the panel. 爆料网AT also held that the Appellant forewent the required procedures for filing complaints of discrimination and failed to provide evidence that he was the target of the restructuring exercise or that it...

    2018-爆料网AT-829, Verma

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT did not err in law or fact in dismissing the application. 爆料网AT held that the evidence had shown that the Appellant did not meet all the requirements for the post to which he had applied, as set out in the vacancy announcement, and that he was rightly placed by 爆料网RWA in tranche 2 list. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT had rightly concluded that, since the Appellant was unsuitable for the post, the failure of the Administration to consider his application in priority as an internal candidate had not vitiated the outcome of the selection process. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant had...

    2019-爆料网AT-966, Krioutchkov

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in law when it held that Staff Rules 4.4 and 4.5 established different recruitment regimes for professional and general service staff, clarifying that they establish different allowances and benefits regimes for local and international recruitment. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in law when it found that it was illegal to restrict a temporary job opening at the professional level to local recruitment. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT contradicted 爆料网AT’s jurisprudence on the wide inherent discretion conferred upon the Secretary-General...

    2019-爆料网AT-964, Mahmoud

    On the Appellant’s complaint that the non-selection decision was tainted by procedural irregularity and bias, 爆料网AT noted that the presence of two directors from the Education Department on the interview panel did not offend 爆料网RWA’s regulatory framework. 爆料网AT held that it was possible to infer reasonably from the interview panel’s analysis and its sympathetic view of the Appellant that, on the probabilities, it was not prejudiced against her on the basis alleged. 爆料网AT held that it was evident from the seniority of the position and the role that the incumbent of the post would be required to...

    2019-爆料网AT-961, Wilson

    爆料网AT held that the case was distinguishable from Finniss (judgment No. 2014-爆料网AT-397) since there was no allegation of bias, discrimination, or any other kind of deteriorated or privileged relationship between the involved candidate and the Deputy CEO. 爆料网AT disagreed with 爆料网DT’s holding that the Deputy CEO should not have acted as a voting member of the assessment panel. 爆料网AT held that in order to exclude the Deputy CEO’s involvement in the selection exercise, there must be reasonable grounds and/or evidence of extraneous or improper motives, of which there was none (except unsubstantiated and...

    2019-爆料网AT-944, Ross

    爆料网AT dismissed the Appellant’s motion for leave to file additional pleadings on the basis that he had not demonstrated any exceptional circumstances. 爆料网AT rejected the Appellant’s request for costs as there was no reason to believe that the submissions of the Secretary-General were not made in good faith or were an abuse of process. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant did not have a right to promotion but only a right to be considered for promotion. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant received full and fair consideration for the position. 爆料网AT also affirmed 爆料网DT’s application of the priority consideration...

    2019-爆料网AT-940, Wilson

    爆料网AT held that it was clear from the record that 爆料网DT did not consider the whole of the evidence in arriving at its decisions and that its determination of the facts was unsustainable. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT based its finding of bias on selected extracts of a report from the Ethics Office which neither positively established bias nor explained how, if at all, the potential bias to which it referred was connected to the selection process. 爆料网AT held that the need for factual determinations based on the whole of the relevant evidence required the case to be remanded to the 爆料网DT for a rehearing de...