爆料网

爆料网RWA

Showing 221 - 230 of 274
2019-爆料网AT-938, Alhawi

Noting that the position in question remained vacant, 爆料网AT held that the decision to leave the position vacant was an exercise of the discretionary authority of 爆料网RWA DT and that there was no procedural irregularity or error of law within the exercise of that discretion. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant did not meet the required burden to be heard on appeal, namely, he failed to identify any of the prescribed grounds of appeal. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant was estopped from raising new arguments on appeal with respect to priority consideration and facts on enrolment which were not argued before...

2019-爆料网AT-937, Alhawi

爆料网AT held that while the 爆料网RWA DT decision could have had an indirect impact on the Appellant’s terms of appointment or contract, a direct effect is needed in order to allow a staff member to contest an adverse administrative decision. 爆料网AT held that the fact that 爆料网RWA granted the change of modality of contract to the other individual did not have any bearing on the outcome of the 爆料网RWA DT decision, because the application was dismissed on receivability grounds. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT did not err in any of its factual findings resulting in a manifestly unreasonable decision. 爆料网AT held that...

2019-爆料网AT-923, Baramky

爆料网AT held that the first time the Appellant’s claim for implementation of the sanction (an apology to the Appellant) was raised was on appeal and that it was therefore not receivable, however, 爆料网AT held that the Appellant was not barred from requesting 爆料网RWA to enforce its letter of censure. On the Appellant’s claim for moral damages, 爆料网AT found no error in 爆料网RWA DT’s order denying the Appellant’s request for moral damages since there was no evidence of harm. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网RWA DT judgment.

2019-爆料网AT-911, El-Arqan

爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT committed an error of fact in stating that the OPT Allowance was paid in local currency, which led 爆料网RWA DT to commit an error of law in stating that Area Staff Circular No. A/04/2014 was applicable. 爆料网AT held that Area Staff Circular No. A/04/2014 was only applicable to the Jerusalem Allowance and not the OPT Allowance, which was paid in US Dollars. 爆料网AT held that such an error of law would be inconsequential if its second line of reasoning, that no rule or policy requires the CAF be applied to the OPT Allowance, was correct. 爆料网AT held that there was no rule requiring...

2019-爆料网AT-905, Ghusoub

爆料网AT rejected the 爆料网RWA Commissioner-General's submission that the appeal was defective because it failed to identify any of the grounds of appeal prescribed by Article 2(1) of the 爆料网AT Statute. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s ground of appeal was without merit. 爆料网AT held that the Commissioner-General was obliged to calculate the Appellant’s retirement benefits in accordance with the new Staff Rule and did so correctly. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT did not commit any error of fact and law in arriving at its decision. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网RWA DT judgment.

2019-爆料网AT-900, El Sadek

With respect to the Appellant’s appeal as it pertained to his 2016 performance evaluation and OTI, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT did not err on a question of law or fact resulting in a manifestly unreasonable decision, nor did it commit an error in procedure such as to affect the outcome of the case. 爆料网AT held that the issue of the e-PERs of the other staff members was not raised before 爆料网RWA DT and, therefore, was not receivable. 爆料网AT held that the reopening of the 2016 e-PER did not affect the overall performance evaluation, which was maintained as “fully meets” expectations, and therefore this...

2019-爆料网AT-899, Ashour

On appeal, 爆料网AT limited its consideration to the issue of the amount of compensation awarded in lieu of rescission and the amount of compensation awarded for harm. On the issue of in lieu compensation, 爆料网AT held that the Appellant failed to advance any error of law or of fact leading to a manifestly unreasonable decision. 爆料网AT noted that in lieu compensation is not intended to compensate for the possible harm suffered by the injured person, as that is the specific aim of compensation for harm. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT had the discretion to fix this amount as a generic sum and was not bound by...

2019-爆料网AT-898, Amarah

爆料网AT considered an appeal by Mr Amarah and the cross-appeal of the Commissioner-General of 爆料网RWA against judgment No. 爆料网RWA/DT/2018/041 and judgment No. 爆料网RWA/DT/2018/004. 爆料网AT held that the issues pertaining to the CSO selection process and the contention that 爆料网RWA had waived the condition of the 18-month separation after the EVS were not properly before it, as they had not been raised before 爆料网RWA DT and were therefore not receivable. Noting that Mr Amarah had breached the prohibition of employment, 爆料网AT held that he could not be allowed to breach the rules knowingly, engage in unlawful...

2020-爆料网AT-1060, Abu Rabei

爆料网AT considered that the 1994 and 2018 requests made by the Appellant to change his date of birth were essentially the same requests. 爆料网AT recalled that the reiteration of an original administrative decision if repeatedly questioned, does not reset the clock with respect to the statutory timeline. 爆料网AT held that the statutory period during which the Appellant had to file a challenge to the 1994 decision expired in 1997. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT did not err in dismissing the application. On consideration of the Respondent’s claim to award costs, 爆料网AT was not satisfied that the pursuit of the...