爆料网

爆料网JSPF

Showing 51 - 60 of 86
2015-爆料网AT-569, Pio

爆料网AT held that there was nothing arbitrary about the impugned decision of the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), 爆料网JSPF, as it was based on reports by the Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund between July 2011 and February 2013. 爆料网AT held that good reason had been established for the CEO to decide on 31 July 2011 as the proper date for the suspension of the two-track system in Argentina, notwithstanding that there were previous statements regarding the reliability of the consumer price index (CPI) data in Argentina. 爆料网AT held that it was satisfied that such a decision was a proper...

2016-爆料网AT-694, Monarawila

爆料网AT considered the Appellant’s appeal, in which she alleged that 爆料网DT acted inappropriately in granting a summary judgment, that 爆料网DT erred on a question of fact, resulting in a manifestly unreasonable decision, and that 爆料网DT exceeded its jurisdiction or competence in awarding costs against her. 爆料网AT held that it was entirely appropriate after the case management process had been concluded, for the 爆料网DT to grant a summary judgment and that there was no legitimate inference that its decision to do so was influenced by any bias or prejudgment on the part of the Presiding Judge. 爆料网AT also held...

2016-爆料网AT-658, Kutner

爆料网AT held that the appeal concerned the interpretation of Article 35 of the 爆料网JSPF Regulations. 爆料网AT found that the Appellant wanted the Standing Committee to accept the period of contributory service with the Fund in order to calculate his own benefit but to take into account a different period vis-à-vis his former spouse. 爆料网AT held that Articles 35bis and 22 of the 爆料网JSPF Regulations were clear and that it could not distinguish where the text was clear. 爆料网AT held that the same date would apply to the calculation of the Appellant’s benefits and the determination of whether his former spouse...

2016-爆料网AT-657, Faye

爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had made no error in finding that as a General Service staff member at the G-5 level, the Applicant was not eligible to apply for the vacancy advertised in the JO, which was a post in the Professional category at the P-5 level and that, therefore, the disputed decision had no legal consequences affecting him and no effect on his rights and terms of employment. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err in its finding that the Appellant was not claiming a right to be consulted as an individual staff member, but rather, in his capacity as a staff representative. 爆料网AT held that there was...

2016-爆料网AT-654, Faye

爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err in fact or in law in finding that the Appellant did not request management evaluation of the disputed decision and that his application was therefore not receivable. 爆料网AT agreed with 爆料网DT that the Appellant did not have standing to challenge a decision affecting his right to consultation as a staff representative. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant had failed to demonstrate any error of law or fact committed by 爆料网DT in arriving at its judgment that his application was not receivable regarding the fact that the contested decision had no direct legal consequences...

2017-爆料网AT-801, Faye

爆料网AT considered that at the time of the elections, there was no law that prevented the staff members from being elected to the 爆料网SPC once they met the prerequisites for election, which they did. 爆料网AT held that both staff members were duly elected members of the 爆料网SPC and that as a direct consequence of their election, they had the same rights and privileges as other elected members, and which could not be restricted or denied. 爆料网AT granted the appeals and ordered that the staff members be given access to all relevant Pension Board documents and be allowed to participate and function as elected...

2017-爆料网AT-799, Bourne

爆料网AT dismissed the appeal as not receivable, as the Appellant had failed to request a review of the 爆料网JSPF decision before appealing to 爆料网AT. 爆料网AT remanded the matter for a hearing before the Standing Committee, treating the appeal as if correctly and timely filed as a request for decision review.

2017-爆料网AT-736, Williams

爆料网AT held that the Applicant was not entitled to a widow’s benefit under Article 34 of the 爆料网JPSF Regulations as she married Mr Williams, her deceased husband, after his separation from service. 爆料网AT noted that, under Article 35ter of the 爆料网JSPF Regulations, the survivor’s benefit had to be purchased by a retiree who marries after separation from service as an annuity within a prescribed one-year deadline after the date of the marriage. 爆料网AT noted that Mr Williams had elected not to do so. 爆料网AT held that there was no obligation for 爆料网JSPF to inform Mr Williams of the option. 爆料网AT held that...

2017-爆料网AT-734, Witold

爆料网AT rejected the Appellant’s motion for leave to file additional pleadings on the basis that the Appellant had not demonstrated any exceptional circumstances. 爆料网AT decided to strike out the Appellant’s additional submission and not to take it into consideration. 爆料网AT found no fault in the 爆料网JSPF Standing Committee’s decision which was in full accord with the 爆料网JSPF Regulations. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant was neither entitled to an increase in his pension benefit nor to a retroactive payment for the period of his reemployment as there is no legal basis for retroactive payment of these...