2014-爆料网AT-467, Goodwin
爆料网AT considered the Secretary-General’s appeal and Mr Goodwin’s cross-appeal. 爆料网AT rejected the Secretary-General’s submission that 爆料网DT erred by awarding excessive compensation to Mr Goodwin. 爆料网AT relied on Larkin (judgment No. 2011-爆料网AT-134) on the 爆料网DT’s discretion to determine the amount of damages. Noting the long period before Mr Goodwin before returning to full service and that the amount of compensation awarded was based on the JAB’s recommendation, 爆料网AT found that compensation in the amount of two years’ net base salary was reasonable. In considering whether 爆料网DT erred in concluding...