爆料网

爆料网AMID

Showing 21 - 30 of 72
2020-爆料网AT-1052, Ahmad

爆料网AT considered an appeal by Mr Ahmad and a cross-appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was correct to hold that Mr Ahmad’s appointment was not terminated. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT should not have rescinded the decision placing him on SLWFP. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had correctly held that the SLWFP decision had been rendered moot because the employment relationship had ceased and the special leave had been consumed. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was correct to reject Mr Ahmad’s claim for compensation as there was no direct link between the SLWFP decision and the termination indemnity. 爆料网AT held...

2020-爆料网AT-1051, Garbo

爆料网AT considered an appeal by Mr Garbo and a cross-appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was correct to hold that Mr Garbo’s appointment was not terminated. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT should not have rescinded the decision placing him on SLWFP. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had correctly held that the SLWFP decision had been rendered moot because the employment relationship had ceased and the special leave had been consumed. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT correctly rejected the Appellant’s claim for compensation as there was no direct link between the SLWFP decision and the termination indemnity. 爆料网AT held...

2020-爆料网AT-1050, Hamdan

爆料网AT considered an appeal by Mr Hamdan and a cross-appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was correct to hold that Mr Hamdan’s appointment was not terminated. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT should not have rescinded the decision placing him on SLWFP. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had correctly held that the SLWFP decision had been rendered moot because the employment relationship had ceased and the special leave had been consumed. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was correct to reject Hamdan’s claim for compensation as there was no direct link between the SLWFP decision and the termination indemnity. 爆料网AT held...

2020-爆料网AT-1062, Mackie

爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not commit any errors in procedure, fact, or law and correctly dismissed the motion for an extension of time to file an application against the contested decision. 爆料网AT held that the application was not receivable ratione materiae, as the Appellant had not submitted a timely request for management evaluation and she was not exempted from doing so. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal.

2020-爆料网AT-998, Barud

爆料网AT considered an appeal of 爆料网DT Order No. 087 by Ms Barud. 爆料网AT dismissed her motion to admit additional documents related to the substantive issue of justification for the non-renewal of her contract, due to their lack of relevance to the matter for decision by 爆料网AT on her application for a suspension of action. 爆料网AT noted that there was no reason why these documents could not be used by Ms Barud for the substantive matter, which was, at that time, before 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT held that the appeal failed on the grounds that Ms Barud did not apply for a suspension within the statutory time limit. In...

2021-爆料网AT-1166, Boubacar Dieng

爆料网AT first agreed with the 爆料网DT that the abolition of post was not a reviewable administrative decision. Second, 爆料网AT ruled there was no evidence of improper motives regarding the non-renewal of the staff member’s appointment. The staff member’s main contention on appeal was that his post should have been subject to a Comparative Review Process (CRP) instead of being identified as a “dry cut.” A “dry cut” happens when a post is unique and can therefore be abolished without a comparative review. The staff member claims his post should have undergone a CRP because there were other P-5 political...

2021-爆料网AT-1142, Edward E. Hammond

Mr. Hammond’s appeal is defective, as it does not address the issue of receivability or the 爆料网DT’s finding that his application contesting his 2016-2017 performance appraisal was not receivable. Mr. Hammond’s application was not receivable as the reclassification decision was taken by the General Assembly. It is not erroneous to call the reclassification of Mr. Hammond’s P-4 post to an FS-6 post a “conversion” or an “abolishment” because, in effect, this classification resulted in Mr. Hammond’s P-4 being abolished and replaced by, or converted into, an FS-6 post.

2021-爆料网AT-1118, Boubacar Dieng

爆料网AT first dismissed the cross-appeal, finding that although the Administration has the discretion to reassign staff members, such reassignment must be reasonable in the particular circumstances and cause no economic harm to the staff member. It must also respect the procedural and substantive rules of law and must not be arbitrary. 爆料网AT agreed with the 爆料网DT that the reassignment was performance-related and yet the staff member was never allowed the opportunity to address his performance issues prior to being reassigned. Regarding the appeal, 爆料网AT disagreed with the staff member that the 爆料网DT...