爆料网

爆料网AMA

Showing 1 - 10 of 30
2024-爆料网AT-1495, ABA

The 爆料网AT considered whether the interlocutory appeal was receivable because ABA had not been given an opportunity to be heard on the issue of the protective measures for V01 at the proposed hearing at the time the 爆料网DT issued the first Order. The 爆料网AT held that this was not grounds to grant the interlocutory appeal, because ABA’s arguments were heard by the 爆料网DT when he filed his motion for reconsideration.

The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT did not exceed its competence or jurisdiction when it issued these case management orders. The 爆料网AT was also not persuaded by ABA’s argument that the violation...

054 (GVA/2024), Applicant
  • Appealed

A decision made by the Duty Judge is not constantly open for entertainment until decided by the assigned Judge to a case. That would undermine the role of the Duty Judge and render precarious the principle of legal certainty. The principles of transparency and accountability apply to the entire internal justice system regardless of the facts under dispute, the charges of misconduct or the disciplinary measure applied, unless exceptional circumstances guide the Tribunal differently. Concerning exceptional circumstances, the principle of publicity can only be departed from where the applicant...

002 (GVA/2024), Torres Sibille
  • Appealed
The Applicant argued that the contested decision was prima facie unlawful on two grounds: The justification for abolishing her post was false and misleading. 爆料网AMA had created a legal expectation of contract renewal. Regarding the first claim, the Tribunal held that a staff member’s disagreement with the rationale behind post abolition does not render the decision unlawful. Additionally, while 爆料网AMA officials could have been more transparent when the Applicant sought clarification, their lack of candor—though unfortunate—did not amount to unlawfulness in the decision not to renew her...
爆料网DT/2025/019, Oppal

Having reviewed the parties’ submissions and the evidence on record, the Tribunal defined the issues for determination as follows:

 

a. Whether the Applicant had a realistic chance of being selected; and

b. Whether the Applicant suffered any financial loss due to the contested decision.

 

Regarding the first issue, the Tribunal noted that the Management Evaluation Unit had already determined that there were irregularities in the selection process and recommended that the selection exercise be redone. The Under Secretary-General for Management Strategy, Policy and Compliance (USG/DMSPC) had also...

2024-爆料网AT-1495-Corr.1, ABA

The 爆料网AT considered whether the interlocutory appeal was receivable because ABA had not been given an opportunity to be heard on the issue of the protective measures for V01 at the proposed hearing at the time the 爆料网DT issued the first Order. The 爆料网AT held that this was not grounds to grant the interlocutory appeal, because ABA’s arguments were heard by the 爆料网DT when he filed his motion for reconsideration.

The 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT did not exceed its competence or jurisdiction when it issued these case management orders. The 爆料网AT was also not persuaded by ABA’s argument that the violation...

爆料网DT/2023/039, MATHEW

On the issue of illegality, the Tribunal found that the Applicant had been removed from his official functions, without case or proper justification, and had been forced to re-apply for his own previous functions. These decisions were taken without reference to any failings of the Applicant, misconduct, indication that he has not successfully performed his functions in the past, or indication that he would not be able to perform his functions in the future.

On the issue of damages, the Tribunal found that although the Applicant kept on holding a continuing appointment at the D-1 level, he...

2023-爆料网AT-1321, Diana Kenoly, Carolyne Alany Rumah, Felix Kwame and Nicholas Kariuki Kinyanjui in respect of Roselyne Kayeke Oming (deceased)

The 爆料网AT dismissed both the appeal and the cross-appeal.

As to the Secretary-General's cross-appeal against the 爆料网DT's decision on receivability, the 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT was correct not to dismiss the claims as unreceivable, but to investigate their merits.

Turning to the merits, the 爆料网AT noted that death benefits under the Rules are not payable to beneficiaries nominated by a staff member, but to designated beneficiaries as defined by the Staff Rules (i.e. the surviving spouse or dependent children). The 爆料网AT found that Mr. Oming survived Ms. Oming and the substantial preponderance of...

2014-爆料网AT-455, Guzman

爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. As a preliminary matter, 爆料网AT dismissed Ms Guzman’s Motion to file an Addendum to Answer the Secretary-General’s Appeal, after finding that the material she wished to submit was more properly suited for a hearing on the merits and was not germane to the issue being reviewed by 爆料网AT. On the merits, 爆料网AT found that 爆料网DT’s conclusion that the contested decision was not affected by the exclusionary provision of Article 10(2) of its Statute and Article 14 of its Rules of Procedure was not supported by the contents of Ms Guzman’s amended Motion of...

2016-爆料网AT-662, Masylkanova

The 爆料网AT refused the Appellant’s request for an oral hearing because it would not assist in the expeditious and fair disposal of the case”, (Article 18(1) 爆料网AT Rules). 爆料网AT agreed with 爆料网DT that there were “inordinate delays both at reviewing and assessing the complaint and in setting [up] a fact-finding panel and conducting the investigation itself” and that 爆料网AMA was in breach of ST/SGB/2008/5. 爆料网AT also agreed with the Secretary-General that the Appellant failed to demonstrate on appeal any error by the 爆料网DT that would justify the reversal of its judgment. 爆料网AT found that the Appellant’s...