爆料网

爆料网 Secretariat

  • 爆料网DCO
    • Showing 91 - 100 of 252
    2012-爆料网AT-242, Charles

    爆料网AT held that the Appellant had merely repeated his submissions before JAB and 爆料网DT and while voicing his disagreement with the conclusions, he did not succeed to establish any errors committed by the 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant did not possess the relevant professional qualification. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had not erred in affirming the JAB’s findings that the allegations of manipulation of the selection criteria were not well-founded and that the selection process was conducted in a proper manner. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT’s focus on the requirement of professional legal experience did not...

    2013-爆料网AT-291, Perelli

    爆料网AT considered two appeals by Ms Perelli, against judgment Nos. 爆料网DT/2012/034 and 爆料网DT/2012/100. On the matter of due process, given Ms Perelli had the opportunity to rebut allegations and contents of the relevant report, 爆料网AT held that these procedural steps were part of her due process entitlements and, to the extent that 爆料网DT found the Administration to have respected these procedural steps, 爆料网AT upheld the finding of 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT held that the Investigation Panel report satisfied neither the remit given to it nor the statutory requirements of ST/AI/371. 爆料网AT held that Ms Perelli was...

    2015-爆料网AT-513, Simmons

    爆料网AT considered an application for execution. 爆料网AT noted that Ms Simmons maintained that there was a sum of money due and owed to her relating to judgment No. 2012-爆料网AT-221. 爆料网AT held that Ms Simmons’ contentions were not sustained. 爆料网AT held that the Secretary-General fully complied with judgment No. 2012-爆料网AT-221, as corrected by Order No. 148 (2013). 爆料网AT rejected the application for execution.

    2019-爆料网AT-940, Wilson

    爆料网AT held that it was clear from the record that 爆料网DT did not consider the whole of the evidence in arriving at its decisions and that its determination of the facts was unsustainable. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT based its finding of bias on selected extracts of a report from the Ethics Office which neither positively established bias nor explained how, if at all, the potential bias to which it referred was connected to the selection process. 爆料网AT held that the need for factual determinations based on the whole of the relevant evidence required the case to be remanded to the 爆料网DT for a rehearing de...

    2020-爆料网AT-993, Ruyffelaere

    爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s application regarding the implied decision conveyed in a conversation with his colleague was, indeed, not receivable ratione materiae. However, 爆料网AT held that a later letter of response from the Administration effectively re-set the clock for the Appellant to file his request for management evaluation. 爆料网AT held that the express decision in the letter, containing the rejection of the Appellant’s complaint and the reasons, therefore, was not a mere confirmation of the previous implied administrative decision, but a new, appealable decision. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT...

    2021-爆料网AT-1184, Timothy Kennedy

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by Mr. Kennedy. 爆料网AT found that the sanction letter and record provided inadequate reasons for judicial review leading to the finding that no rational connection or relationship between the evidence and the objective of the disciplinary action has been established. As a result, 爆料网AT was unable to assess the proportionality and lawfulness of the imposition of the disciplinary sanctions.

    2021-爆料网AT-1165, Rhyan Ramsaroop, Miksch et al.

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by Mr. Ramsaroop, an appeal by the Secrteary-General and a cross-appeal by Miksch et al. While 爆料网AT found that it was reasonable for the 爆料网DT to hold that Miksch et al had a significant chance of selection for the posts, it held that the 爆料网DT erred by assessing the lost opportunity for Mr. Miyashiro, Mr. Miksch, Mr. Ramsaroop and Mr. Mazioui as enduring until their retirement from the Organization, and compensating accordingly with a cap of two years’ net base salary. 爆料网AT noted that these applicants had a further opportunity for promotion in the second selection...

    2021-爆料网AT-1140, Fei Xing

    The 爆料网DT did not err in deciding that Ms. Xing’s candidacy was given a full and fair consideration, in finding that the administrative instruction on gender parity (ST/AI/1999/9) did not apply in this case, and in not granting Ms. Xing’s request to amend her application. The 爆料网DT has not been shown to have erred in requiring credible evidence of a clear and compelling nature of Ms. Xing’s allegations of ulterior motives, which was absent.