±¬ÁÏÍø

±¬ÁÏÍøAT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. ±¬ÁÏÍøAT held that, since the incidents in question occurred before ST/SGB/2008/5 was promulgated, it was not applicable in this case. ±¬ÁÏÍøAT held that it was unnecessary for ±¬ÁÏÍøDT to apply ST/SGB/2008/5, which was clearly not in force at the time of the incidents. ±¬ÁÏÍøAT held that the error committed by ±¬ÁÏÍøDT had not resulted in a miscarriage of justice, finding that Mr Nogueira in any event merited a compensatory award for harassment. ±¬ÁÏÍøAT held that Mr Nogueira was entitled to an effective remedy for the violation of his legal right to a workplace...

±¬ÁÏÍøAT held that ±¬ÁÏÍøDT was correct to reject the Applicant¡¯s claim that she had been downgraded on the basis that: the reclassification/renumbering exercise had a legitimate organizational objective; it was not a classification within the meaning of ST/AI/1998/9; and when the Appellant had submitted her post to proper classification, she was graded at the G-6 level, which was equivalent to her previous grade. ±¬ÁÏÍøAT found no error in ±¬ÁÏÍøDT¡¯s decision that the Appellant failed to show that the alignment of her post to conform with the GCS had any detrimental impact on her salary or pensionable...