爆料网

N/A

Showing 1 - 9 of 9
2023-爆料网AT-1379, Leopold Camille Yodjeu Ntemde

The 爆料网AT considered three appeals by the applicant.

The 爆料网AT found that the impugned Order was an interlocutory order and was obviously beyond the competence of the 爆料网AT.

The 爆料网AT held that the applicant had not submitted documents to prove being a United Nations staff member and that he had no legal standing before the 爆料网DT. The 爆料网AT noted that there was no evidence of an offer of appointment having been issued to him for either post. Second, he failed to complete the pre-recruitment formalities for both posts. Third, he failed to confirm, within a reasonable time, his interest and...

爆料网DT/2023/015, Hakimi

The Tribunal noted that, firstly, the Applicant does not contest an administrative decision taken by the Secretary-General as the Chief Administrative Officer of the United Nations. Secondly, FAO has not concluded a special agreement with the Secretary-General, under art. 2.5 of the Tribunal's Statute, to accept the terms of the Tribunal's jurisdiction. Consequently, the Tribunal found that it was not competent to examine the present application.

2023-爆料网AT-1342, AAL

The 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal. The 爆料网AT found that AAL was given notice of the need for her to return to the duty station, as well as sufficient opportunity to apply for sick leave. However, she did not request such sick leave, nor did she return to work, leaving no option for the Administration other than to place her on SLWOP. She also failed to provide evidence that there were “compelling personal circumstances” so as to engender a decision to allow her to continue to telecommute from outside her official duty station. The 爆料网AT further found that the 爆料网DT did not err in finding that AAL...

2016-爆料网AT-693, Ruger

爆料网AT considered the appeal. 爆料网AT found that 爆料网DT did not err in finding that the Appellant’s case did not constitute “exceptional cases,” so as to justify a waiver of the time limit, pursuant to Article 8(3) of the 爆料网DT Statute. 爆料网AT also did not find any exceptional circumstances requiring it to receive additional documentary evidence, pursuant to Article 2(5) of the 爆料网AT Statute, nor did it find that its content would have affected the decision of the case. 爆料网AT found no reversible error in 爆料网DT’s rejection of the Appellant’s motion for extension of time and its summary dismissal of her...

2018-爆料网AT-842, Mirella et al.

On an appeal by the Secretary-General, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in concluding that the applications were receivable. 爆料网AT noted that Article 2(1) of the 爆料网DT Statute limits the 爆料网DT’s jurisdiction to hearing appeals against administrative decisions. 爆料网AT defined an administrative decision as a unilateral decision of an administrative nature taken by the administration involving the exercise of a power or the performance of a function in terms of a statutory instrument, which adversely affects the rights of a staff member and produces direct legal consequences. 爆料网AT noted that, with the...

2018-爆料网AT-841, Quijano-Evans et al.

爆料网AT considered the Secretary-General's appeal and the staff members’ cross-appeal. 爆料网AT first considered the receivability of the appeal and held that the applications were receivable because the contested decision would have an adverse impact on the staff members. With respect to the merits of the appeal, 爆料网AT noted that the salary entitlements of staff members are statutory in nature and may be unilaterally amended by the General Assembly. 爆料网AT further noted that an individual loss caused by a unilateral variation of a validly concluded contract poses no legal obstacle to the exercise of...

2018-爆料网AT-840, Lloret-Alca?iz et al.

爆料网AT found that the appeal raised significant questions of law about the power of the Organisation to unilaterally alter or reduce the compensation of staff members of the Organisation. For that reason, the President of 爆料网AT in terms of Article 10(2) of the 爆料网AT Statute elected to refer the appeal for consideration by the full bench of 爆料网AT. 爆料网AT recalled that an administrative decision is a unilateral decision of an administrative nature taken by the administration involving the exercise of a power or the performance of a function in terms of a statutory instrument, which adversely affects...

2021-爆料网AT-1170, Matthew Lee

This case was presided by Judge Halfeld, and Judge Murphy drafted the majority opinion. The Majority (Halfeld, Murphy, Raikos and Knierim) dismissed the appeal and held that the appeal was not receivable. Without deciding on the issue whether the 爆料网DT has an inherent right to hold a non-party in contempt, the Majority found that the appeal did not meet the requirements of the 爆料网AT Statute. The Majority explained that it had jurisdiction ratione materiae to hear and pass judgment on an appeal pursuant to Article 2(1) of the Statute in which it is asserted that the 爆料网DT has: (a) exceeded its...