爆料网

Eligibility

  • Central Review Body
  • Décision de sélection
  • Eligibility
  • Examen complet et équitable
  • Full and fair consideration
  • Interview
  • Selection decision
  • Standard of proof
  • Written test
    • Showing 31 - 40 of 65
    2017-爆料网AT-762, Lemmonier

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. On the issue of receivability, contrary to Mr Lemonnier’s contention that the Secretary-General’s appeal is not receivable because the impugned judgment did not award him any damages and was mere “a moral victory”, 爆料网AT held that success before 爆料网DT depends on whether the staff member’s application is granted, in whole or in part, not on the remedy afforded to the staff member, and that the staff member may prevail or succeed on his claim(s) without receiving an award of damages. According to 爆料网AT, as the unsuccessful party before 爆料网DT, the...

    2018-爆料网AT-880, Munyan

    爆料网AT considered the appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that the Secretary-General’s appeal was in direct conflict with his submissions to 爆料网DT. While the Secretary-General acknowledged procedural irregularities by the Hiring Manager to 爆料网DT, in his appeal he argued that no irregularities happened in removing the Applicant’s name from the list and that the Hiring Manager was entitled to exercise her discretion and correct her mistakes after further assessing the candidate’s qualifications. 爆料网AT held that no evidence was presented to 爆料网DT of a second assessment by the Hiring Manager or...

    2018-爆料网AT-878, Pinto

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in finding the Hiring Manuals binding on the Administration, nonetheless, confirming that the Hiring Manager’s reliance on the shortlist prepared by the CSS/OSU constituted a procedural irregularity in terms of Section 7. 4 of ST/AI/2010/3, which undisputedly enjoys binding legal authority. 爆料网AT held that such irregularities only result in the rescission of a non-selection decision or of the decision not to shortlist a candidate in case the candidate had a significant chance, which could not be verified in this case, the same logic being applicable to compensation for...

    2018-爆料网AT-829, Verma

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT did not err in law or fact in dismissing the application. 爆料网AT held that the evidence had shown that the Appellant did not meet all the requirements for the post to which he had applied, as set out in the vacancy announcement, and that he was rightly placed by 爆料网RWA in tranche 2 list. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT had rightly concluded that, since the Appellant was unsuitable for the post, the failure of the Administration to consider his application in priority as an internal candidate had not vitiated the outcome of the selection process. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant had...

    2019-爆料网AT-966, Krioutchkov

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in law when it held that Staff Rules 4.4 and 4.5 established different recruitment regimes for professional and general service staff, clarifying that they establish different allowances and benefits regimes for local and international recruitment. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in law when it found that it was illegal to restrict a temporary job opening at the professional level to local recruitment. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT contradicted 爆料网AT’s jurisprudence on the wide inherent discretion conferred upon the Secretary-General...

    2019-爆料网AT-947, Madhoun

    爆料网AT noted that in the absence of a university degree, the Appellant did not satisfy the academic criterion stated in the vacancy announcement, but he was long-listed, which meant that 爆料网RWA took his experience into consideration and decided that his additional years of experience justified his pre-selection. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT erred in fact in considering that 爆料网RWA did not examine whether the experience of the Appellant could offset his lack of a university degree. 爆料网AT held that the decision by 爆料网RWA to limit the short-list to seven candidates with university degrees was reasonable and...

    2019-爆料网AT-934, Kauf

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not make any errors of law and fact when it concluded that the Administration, having issued the offer of appointment on the basis of a factual error to an ineligible candidate who was legally barred from being recruited, had a duty to withdraw the offer, as soon as the mistake was discovered; and that the Administration was legally precluded from issuing a letter of appointment to the Appellant. 爆料网AT held that, on the basis that it had concluded that 爆料网DT did not make any errors of law and fact, it was unnecessary to examine the other grounds of appeal advanced by the...

    2019-爆料网AT-928, Abdellaoui

    爆料网AT held that the decision not to short-list the Appellant was an internal step within the selection process and not an administrative decision and that 爆料网DT should have only received her application against the selection decision whilst the decision not to short-list the Appellant is examined as a part of the final non-selection decision. 爆料网AT held that the appeal was defective as the Appellant did not clearly define the grounds of appeal as required under Article 2(1) of the 爆料网AT Statute, however it considered the appeal on the basis that the Appellant was self-represented. 爆料网AT rejected...

    2019-爆料网AT-919, Krioutchkov

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that the issue of whether the staff member’s application was pre-screened by a Human Resources Officer was irrelevant in determining whether his candidature received full and fair consideration. On the basis that 爆料网DT failed to enquire as to what options were available to the staff member on Inspira at the time of application, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT’s findings that Inspira did not reflect the variety of the educational system of all the Member States equally and that the staff member’s candidature had not been afforded full and fair...

    2019-爆料网AT-920, Krioutchkov

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in finding that the erroneous requirement for a perfect command of English vitiated the entire recruitment process, noting that it was a typographic error and corrective measures were taken by conducting a manual review of the personal history profile of each candidate. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in its finding that the selection process was unlawful and lacked transparency. 爆料网AT held that the need for the factual determination of all of the evidence related to the roster, placement, and removal of candidates required that the instant case be remanded to the 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT...