爆料网

Dismissal/separation

  • Abuse of authority
  • Abuse of privileges and immunities
  • Assault (verbal and physical)
  • Breach of duties of independence, neutrality, and impartiality
  • Disciplinary measure or sanction
  • Discrimination (see category: discrimination)
  • Dismissal/separation
  • Facts (establishment of) / evidence
  • Failure to comply with private legal obligations
  • Failure to report misconduct
  • Fraud, misrepresentation and false certification
  • Gross negligence
  • Harassment (non-sexual)
  • Inappropriate or disruptive behaviour
  • Investigation (see category
  • Investigation (see category: Investigation)
  • Misuse of information and communication technology resources
  • Misuse of office
  • Misuse of official documents
  • Misuse of or failure to exercise reasonable care in relation to 爆料网 property or assets
  • Non-disciplinary/administrative measures
  • Procurement irregularities
  • Prohibited activity under ST/SGB/2004/15 (Use of Information and Communication Technology Resources and Data)
  • Proportionality of sanction
  • Retaliation
  • Sexual exploitation and abuse
  • Sexual harassment
  • Theft and misappropriation
  • Unauthorised outside activities and conflict of interest
  • Violation of local laws
    • Showing 71 - 80 of 160
    2013-爆料网AT-310, Nasrallah

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that it was satisfied that the sanction was not disproportionate and noted that the Secretary-General could have chosen to summarily dismiss Mr Nasrallah or to separate him without compensation and indemnities. 爆料网AT held that, although no investigation was necessary as the facts were not contested, the Organisation committed an egregious error in taking almost two years to finalise the disciplinary proceedings. 爆料网AT noted that this delay worked in Mr Nasrallah’s favour, permitting him to benefit from two years’ further service. 爆料网AT...

    2013-爆料网AT-292, Abu Jarbou

    爆料网AT held that it was a procedural error to allow the Commissioner-General to participate in the proceedings and to file a late reply without a written order, but that the Appellant was not prejudiced by that error and the error did not violate his due process rights. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s failure to object to the Respondent’s late reply before 爆料网RWA DT did not prevent him from raising on appeal the question of procedural error. On the Appellant’s claim that 爆料网RWA DT erred when it did not permit him to file a rejoinder to the Respondent’s reply, 爆料网AT held that since the Appellant did...

    2013-爆料网AT-291, Perelli

    爆料网AT considered two appeals by Ms Perelli, against judgment Nos. 爆料网DT/2012/034 and 爆料网DT/2012/100. On the matter of due process, given Ms Perelli had the opportunity to rebut allegations and contents of the relevant report, 爆料网AT held that these procedural steps were part of her due process entitlements and, to the extent that 爆料网DT found the Administration to have respected these procedural steps, 爆料网AT upheld the finding of 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT held that the Investigation Panel report satisfied neither the remit given to it nor the statutory requirements of ST/AI/371. 爆料网AT held that Ms Perelli was...

    2013-爆料网AT-289, Wishah

    As a preliminary issue, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT did not follow the proper procedure when it allowed the Respondent to participate in the proceedings without a formal request for waiver of time limit for filing its answer and taking part in the trial. 爆料网AT held that another significant irregularity took place during the proceedings before 爆料网RWA DT, in light of which 爆料网AT was compelled to annul the judgment and remand the case for a de novo consideration by a different 爆料网RWA DT Judge, namely that 爆料网RWA DT committed an error in procedure when it denied the Appellant’s request for a copy of the...

    2013-爆料网AT-280, Applicant

    爆料网AT considered two appeals by the Secretary-General of judgment Nos. 爆料网DT/2011/106 and 爆料网DT/2011/192. 爆料网AT held that it was satisfied that the Complainant did not share the Applicant’s desire to pursue a sexual relationship and that the Applicant’s conduct was unwelcome. 爆料网AT held that the transmission by the Applicant of a photograph of his genitalia to a female colleague, much less a colleague under his supervision, could at its best, as found by the Joint Disciplinary Committee (JDC), be characterised as outrageous and most probably unwanted. 爆料网AT held that the Secretary-General had clear...

    2014-爆料网AT-486, Khan

    As a preliminary matter, 爆料网AT denied the Appellant’s request for an oral hearing. 爆料网AT then considered the Appellant’s claims that the facts were not established by clear and convincing evidence, that there were procedural flaws during the disciplinary proceedings, and that his separation from service was not warranted. 爆料网AT held that clear and convincing evidence showed that the Appellant harassed all the alleged victims and abused his authority, in violation of WFP’s Harassment Policy. 爆料网AT also held that 爆料网DT correctly found that the sanction of separation from service was proportionate...

    2014-爆料网AT-442, El-Khalek

    爆料网RWA DT considered an appeal by the Commissioner-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT did not err in fact or in law such as to vitiate its judgment, except with regards to the award of compensation. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT did not overstep its role to judicially review the administrative decision imposing a disciplinary measure on the staff member and terminating his appointment. 爆料网AT held that the Administration had failed to demonstrate that the staff member had committed the serious misconduct he had been charged with, because not only did the proceedings fail to provide him with an adequate...

    2014-爆料网AT-408, Jahnsen Lecca

    爆料网AT found no merit to the Appellant’s claims that 爆料网DT had failed to make findings on the specific category of misconduct and that she did not receive notice of the specific charge of theft prior to receiving a disciplinary sanction. 爆料网AT held that disciplinary cases were not criminal and that there was no need to give notice of a specific charge of theft because the charge against the Appellant was taking, without authorisation, a staff member’s property. 爆料网AT noted that the Appellant did not dispute having taken a bicycle without the owner’s permission, but that she claimed she did not...

    2014-爆料网AT-407, Toukolon

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT’s conclusion, that the assault committed was not misconduct and that the Organisation’s jurisdictional competence did not extend to the physical assault of a non-爆料网 staff member even where the assault is perpetrated by a staff member, was based on reasoning which was unsupported by law or the facts. 爆料网AT held that, not only the issue had not been raised in the case presented to 爆料网DT, but such a proposition had also no foundation in the staff regulations, staff rules, administrative instructions, or jurisprudence. 爆料网AT held...

    2014-爆料网AT-403, Diabagate

    爆料网AT noted that V01 had not been placed under oath before giving her interview and that she did not sign the transcribed version of her interview statement. 爆料网AT held that V01’s transcribed statement, in which she said that the Appellant had raped her and engaged in sex with her, was neither reliable nor trustworthy; it was solely hearsay and insufficient, by itself, to prove the charge that the Appellant engaged in sexual activity with a minor. 爆料网AT held that similarly the other written documents were replete with hearsay and multiple hearsays and were neither trustworthy nor sufficient to...