爆料网

Disciplinary measure or sanction

  • Abuse of authority
  • Abuse of privileges and immunities
  • Assault (verbal and physical)
  • Breach of duties of independence, neutrality, and impartiality
  • Disciplinary measure or sanction
  • Discrimination (see category: discrimination)
  • Dismissal/separation
  • Facts (establishment of) / evidence
  • Failure to comply with private legal obligations
  • Failure to report misconduct
  • Fraud, misrepresentation and false certification
  • Gross negligence
  • Harassment (non-sexual)
  • Inappropriate or disruptive behaviour
  • Investigation (see category
  • Investigation (see category: Investigation)
  • Misuse of information and communication technology resources
  • Misuse of office
  • Misuse of official documents
  • Misuse of or failure to exercise reasonable care in relation to 爆料网 property or assets
  • Non-disciplinary/administrative measures
  • Procurement irregularities
  • Prohibited activity under ST/SGB/2004/15 (Use of Information and Communication Technology Resources and Data)
  • Proportionality of sanction
  • Retaliation
  • Sexual exploitation and abuse
  • Sexual harassment
  • Theft and misappropriation
  • Unauthorised outside activities and conflict of interest
  • Violation of local laws
    • Showing 81 - 90 of 202
    2012-爆料网AT-209, Applicant

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General against the judgment on the merits (爆料网DT/2011/054) and two further appeals by both the Secretary-General and the Applicant of the judgment on compensation (爆料网DT/2011/131). Relying on its previous holding in Bertucci (2011/爆料网AT/114), 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in finding that the Administration violated the Applicant’s due process rights, as no actual prejudice was found. 爆料网AT held that the established facts, as admitted by the Applicant, clearly demonstrated that he engaged in the sexual harassment of local employees and used his position of...

    2012-爆料网AT-207, Hallal

    爆料网AT considered an appeal, in which the Appellant claimed that 爆料网DT committed procedural errors in allowing the Secretary-General to embark on a de novo fact-finding inquiry and that the disciplinary measure of separation was disproportionate. 爆料网AT held that it was within the competence of 爆料网DT to hold oral hearings as well as to order the production of evidence for fair and expeditious disposal of the proceedings. 爆料网AT held that the Administration bears the burden of establishing that the alleged misconduct, for which a disciplinary measure has been taken against a staff member, occurred and...

    2012-爆料网AT-195, Shahatit

    爆料网AT considered the Appellant’s appeal. 爆料网AT noted that the established facts showed that the Appellant’s negligence as Head Storekeeper facilitated the misconduct of other staff members and his negligence was evidenced by the excess of merchandise in the storeroom under his control, and by his failure to keep an inventory of the items in his custody. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant neither successfully rebutted these facts, nor demonstrated any flaws in the administrative and disciplinary procedures. 爆料网AT held that the sanction of demotion was lawful. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the...

    2013-爆料网AT-381, Applicant

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General against judgment No. 爆料网DT/2012/159; an appeal by the “Applicant” (anonymity granted) against judgment No. 爆料网DT/2013/079; and a cross-appeal by the Secretary-General of judgment No. 爆料网DT/2013/079. On receivability, 爆料网AT considered the Secretary-General’s case that 爆料网DT erred on the issue of receivability as the non-disciplinary issues contested by the Applicant were never submitted for management evaluation. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT, in deciding that the non-disciplinary issues had been submitted for management evaluation, erred in law and in fact...

    2013-爆料网AT-337, Leal

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that grounds existed to discharge Mr Leal for misconduct, without needing to address the issue of the alleged circumvention of the recruitment process for the purposes of hiring. 爆料网AT held that the misconduct and disciplinary measure of dismissal fell within the discretion of the Secretary-General and could not be seen as disproportionate to the offences unless it was the result of proven abuse or arbitrary exercise of that discretion. 爆料网AT held that the key elements of Mr Leal’s due process were met. 爆料网AT held that, since the...

    2013-爆料网AT-336, Akello

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that it was satisfied that Ms Akello’s involvement in the private company Blessed Seasons, which was on a 爆料网 list of companies providing escort vehicle services, met the standard of business activity and enterprise prohibited by former Staff Regulation 1. 2(m) and that her activities amounted to a conflict of interest. 爆料网AT held that, in ruling otherwise, 爆料网DT erred in law and fact and the Secretary-General’s appeal succeeded on that ground. On the issue of whether the very fact that the Internal Affairs Unit investigation, having...

    2013-爆料网AT-334, Konate

    爆料网AT held that, whilst not all the allegations of misconduct with which the staff member was charged were proven, it was established by 爆料网DT that the Appellant failed to apply formal methods of solicitation in respect of contracts, in violation of 爆料网FPA Financial Regulations, Rules and Procurement Procedures and also failed to refer a contract to the 爆料网FPA Headquarters Contracts Review Committee, in violation of further norms. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant had not established any errors of fact or law warranting reversal of the impugned judgment. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT correctly declined to accept...

    2013-爆料网AT-326, Jibara

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Commissioner-General and a cross-appeal by Mr Jibara. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT lacked jurisdiction to decide on the scope of the Oslo Accords signed by Israel and the Palestinian National Authority or the legality of the detention and imprisonment. 爆料网AT recalled that it was not the role of 爆料网DT to substitute its own decision for that of the Administration. 爆料网AT recalled that, having established misconduct and the seriousness of the incident, 爆料网AT cannot review the level of a sanction imposed except in cases of obvious absurdity or flagrant arbitrariness. 爆料网AT...

    2013-爆料网AT-302, Applicant

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that the weight of the evidence, in that case, justified the decision taken by 爆料网ICEF. 爆料网AT held, while acknowledging the importance of confrontation and cross-examination of witnesses, that due process did not always require that a staff member defending himself against disciplinary action for summary dismissal had the right to confront and cross-examine his/her accusers. Under certain circumstances, denial of this right did not necessarily fatally flaw the entire process, so long as it was established to 爆料网AT’s satisfaction that...

    2013-爆料网AT-292, Abu Jarbou

    爆料网AT held that it was a procedural error to allow the Commissioner-General to participate in the proceedings and to file a late reply without a written order, but that the Appellant was not prejudiced by that error and the error did not violate his due process rights. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s failure to object to the Respondent’s late reply before 爆料网RWA DT did not prevent him from raising on appeal the question of procedural error. On the Appellant’s claim that 爆料网RWA DT erred when it did not permit him to file a rejoinder to the Respondent’s reply, 爆料网AT held that since the Appellant did...