爆料网

Disciplinary matters / misconduct

  • Abuse of authority
  • Abuse of privileges and immunities
  • Assault (verbal and physical)
  • Breach of duties of independence, neutrality, and impartiality
  • Disciplinary measure or sanction
  • Discrimination (see category: discrimination)
  • Dismissal/separation
  • Facts (establishment of) / evidence
  • Failure to comply with private legal obligations
  • Failure to report misconduct
  • Fraud, misrepresentation and false certification
  • Gross negligence
  • Harassment (non-sexual)
  • Inappropriate or disruptive behaviour
  • Investigation (see category
  • Investigation (see category: Investigation)
  • Misuse of information and communication technology resources
  • Misuse of office
  • Misuse of official documents
  • Misuse of or failure to exercise reasonable care in relation to 爆料网 property or assets
  • Non-disciplinary/administrative measures
  • Procurement irregularities
  • Prohibited activity under ST/SGB/2004/15 (Use of Information and Communication Technology Resources and Data)
  • Proportionality of sanction
  • Retaliation
  • Sexual exploitation and abuse
  • Sexual harassment
  • Theft and misappropriation
  • Unauthorised outside activities and conflict of interest
  • Violation of local laws
    • Showing 361 - 370 of 722
    2019-爆料网AT-918, Nadasan

    On the delay before 爆料网DT, 爆料网AT agreed that the delay was unfort爆料网ATe but held that the Applicant had not demonstrated that it was a procedural error affecting the outcome of the case. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in exercising its case management discretion when it refused the request for an oral hearing, but that this error did not affect the decision of the case. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err as there was clear and convincing evidence that the Applicant had committed sexual harassment. 爆料网AT held that the disciplinary sanction of separation from service with compensation in lieu of notice and...

    2019-爆料网AT-909, Haroun

    Noting that the Appellant, the innocent party, lost her employment, her career prospects within the Organisation, and the offending managers remained entrenched in their positions, 爆料网AT held that there was a substantial variation or a striking disparity between the award made by 爆料网DT and the award that 爆料网AT considered ought to have been made. 爆料网AT held that, given that an order of reinstatement was unlikely to be implemented, a more generous award was justifiable in the circumstances. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err in law or fact in denying moral damages, as there was no corroborating...

    2020-爆料网AT-1073, Erik Kennes

    爆料网AT affirmed 爆料网DT’s position regarding the moment the Appellant knew or reasonably should have known of the content and finality of the decision and that it triggered the time limit to request management evaluation. 爆料网AT further affirmed 爆料网DT’s position that the Appellant’s request for management evaluation was time-barred. 爆料网AT, however, noted that 爆料网DT should have found the application not receivable ratione materiae, which is the case if there is no timely request for management evaluation, rather than ratione temporis. 爆料网AT further noted that this error by 爆料网DT did not adversely affect...

    2020-爆料网AT-1061, Abu Osba

    As a preliminary matter, 爆料网AT held that an oral hearing was not necessary and would not assist in the expeditious and fair disposal of the case as the Appellant had not provided grounds for an oral hearing beyond seeking to confront the witnesses and comment on existing evidence. Whilst 爆料网AT held that the Appellant failed to identify any errors of law or fact by 爆料网RWA DT as required under Art 2(1) 爆料网AT Statute, 爆料网AT did go on to consider his appeal as he was not represented. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT had correctly applied the standard of review for disciplinary cases and that 爆料网RWA DT’s exercise...

    2020-爆料网AT-1070, Halidou

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in attaching no weight to the medical evidence and in finding that the disciplinary measure imposed was based on an incorrect determination of the nature and gravity of the assault. 爆料网AT held that there were other more important factors to consider, including the fact that the Appellant was a staff member in charge of local security and that his conduct was an abuse of authority and oppressive of a local inhabitant. 爆料网AT recalled that the test of proportionality required a comparison between the misconduct and the sanction, not the investigation and disciplinary...

    2020-爆料网AT-1057, Nsengiyumva

    On the Appellant’s claim that the 爆料网DT Judge was biased, 爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s specific allegations were not made out and any missteps in the conduct of the hearing did not warrant interference with the result. On the Appellant’s claim that his supervisor harassed him to the extent that his actions were mitigated substantially, 爆料网AT held that even if the Appellant established that there was a dysfunctional relationship between him and his supervisor, this could not have had the effect of mitigating his actions significantly, such were the scale and duration of his misconduct. 爆料网AT...

    2020-爆料网AT-1024, Nyawa

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General and a cross-appeal by Mr. Nyawa. 爆料网AT held that there was clear and convincing evidence that Mr. Nyawa committed the disciplinary offenses attributed to him. 爆料网AT held that the established facts amounted to misconduct on the part of Mr. Nyawa. 爆料网AT disagreed with 爆料网DT that a written censure was subsumed by the sanction of deferment for eligibility for promotion, however, 爆料网AT found that 爆料网DT’s holding that the deferment for eligibility for promotion was sufficient sanction was not a manifestly unreasonable decision warranting 爆料网AT intervention...

    2020-爆料网AT-1006, Suleiman

    ngl爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT did not err in law or fact in finding that the facts on which the disciplinary measure was based had been established. 爆料网AT agreed with 爆料网RWA DT that the preponderance of the evidence showed that the Appellant hit a student forcefully on the back during the 25 October 2016 distribution of school bags. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT did not err in relying on the testimony of the Donor Relations Officer (DRO), which is of high value. 爆料网AT noted that he was a neutral witness without any personal interest in the matter and he did not know the Appellant before. 爆料网AT held that...

    2020-爆料网AT-1001, Applicant

    爆料网AT held that the Appellant failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances warranting the admission of additional evidence on appeal. 爆料网AT found no errors in the 爆料网DT’s analysis that there were no procedural flaws in the investigation that impacted the Appellant’s rights. 爆料网AT found no errors in 爆料网DT’s finding that the Administration had the discretion to initiate disciplinary proceedings. 爆料网AT held that the Administration could neither be compelled to initiate disciplinary proceedings nor impose the reasonable accommodation requested by the Appellant, namely no contact with his First...

    2020-爆料网AT-1033, Negussie

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was correct not to conclude that the Appellant had initiated the physical fight. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was entitled to conclude the evidence of a witness was not clear and convincing, given inconsistencies. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT determined correctly that a prior altercation could not provide propensity evidence to corroborate witnesses’ accounts of the physical fight because the prior altercation was not investigated properly. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT committed an error in concluding that the Appellant had been unduly influenced into signing the settlement agreement, but that 爆料网DT...