爆料网

Disciplinary matters / misconduct

  • Abuse of authority
  • Abuse of privileges and immunities
  • Assault (verbal and physical)
  • Breach of duties of independence, neutrality, and impartiality
  • Disciplinary measure or sanction
  • Discrimination (see category: discrimination)
  • Dismissal/separation
  • Facts (establishment of) / evidence
  • Failure to comply with private legal obligations
  • Failure to report misconduct
  • Fraud, misrepresentation and false certification
  • Gross negligence
  • Harassment (non-sexual)
  • Inappropriate or disruptive behaviour
  • Investigation (see category
  • Investigation (see category: Investigation)
  • Misuse of information and communication technology resources
  • Misuse of office
  • Misuse of official documents
  • Misuse of or failure to exercise reasonable care in relation to 爆料网 property or assets
  • Non-disciplinary/administrative measures
  • Procurement irregularities
  • Prohibited activity under ST/SGB/2004/15 (Use of Information and Communication Technology Resources and Data)
  • Proportionality of sanction
  • Retaliation
  • Sexual exploitation and abuse
  • Sexual harassment
  • Theft and misappropriation
  • Unauthorised outside activities and conflict of interest
  • Violation of local laws
    • Showing 351 - 360 of 722
    2019-爆料网AT-972, Al Othman

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT committed errors of law and fact resulting in a manifestly unreasonable decision. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT erred in its assessment of the alleged victim’s credibility. 爆料网AT held that, contrary to 爆料网RWA DT’s understanding, there was no record that the alleged victim had stated that she had been sexually attacked by the Appellant on previous occasions. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT erred in drawing a negative inference about the credibility of the alleged victim from her delayed reporting. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA erred in its assessment of the Appellant’s credibility, in particular...

    2019-爆料网AT-952, Rolli

    爆料网AT held that the findings of the WMO JAB were not adequately articulated in the written record; it did not furnish a written decision dealing fully with the factual and legal issues. 爆料网AT held that because the factual basis for the JAB’s determination that the summary dismissal was justified was not clear and in the JAB report, it was not possible to establish whether the JAB made the alleged errors on the relevant questions of fact, resulting in a manifestly unreasonable decision. 爆料网AT held that because the JAB limited its inquiry to determine whether the decision was motivated by prejudice...

    2019-爆料网AT-956, Ladu

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err and that clear and convincing evidence established that the Appellant participated in an attempted taking of property belonging to the Organisation. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err in concluding that the disciplinary sanction of dismissal from service was proportionate and lawful. On the Appellant’s claim that the items were “garbage”, 爆料网AT held that this claim was entirely without merit as the evidence showed that the items included over USD 5,000 worth of material, including boxes of new floor tiles. On the Appellant’s claim that 爆料网DT failed to fully assess...

    2019-爆料网AT-955, Turkey

    The 爆料网DT judgment was appealed by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not exceed the scope of judicial review by reviewing the facts and concluding that there was sufficient evidence of inebriation but concluding there was a lower level of alcohol consumed based on the breathalyzer result. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT correctly balanced the competing considerations and concluded reasonably that the imposition of the sanction of separation from service with compensation in lieu of notice and termination indemnity was disproportionate to the misconduct. 爆料网AT held that the fact that the...

    2019-爆料网AT-976, Ganbold

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had committed various errors of law, fact, and procedure. 爆料网AT held that the whole reasoning of 爆料网DT was misconstrued and 爆料网DT did not properly examine the lawfulness of the disciplinary sanction. 爆料网AT held that there was clear and convincing evidence that the Appellant awarded and signed a contract on behalf of 爆料网FPA, that she did not conduct any market research or consider other suppliers before doing so, that she had no authority to sign the contract and that she was involved in procurement activities in relation to another 爆料网FPA vendor. Further, 爆料网AT held that there was...

    2019-爆料网AT-939, Delaunay

    爆料网AT held that the ICJ had breached its duty to protect the staff member against harassment by another staff member. 爆料网AT held that, once senior management had become aware of the incidents, it should have envisaged that similar incidents could happen in the future, and it failed to take the appropriate measures to protect its staff. 爆料网AT awarded USD 12,500 to compensate the staff member for the harm suffered, and especially the harm to her reputation during the course of the investigations. 爆料网AT also awarded 3,630 Euros in legal fees.

    2019-爆料网AT-935, Jenbere

    爆料网AT held that the appeal was entirely without merit. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was correct to find that the facts supporting the disciplinary measure had been established and to conclude that those facts amounted to misconduct. 爆料网AT supported the reasoning of 爆料网DT in rejecting the Appellant’s attempts at exoneration, namely that factors such as whether or not her husband was qualified for the job or the other candidate secured another position did not change the existence of a conflict of interest and the way in which the integrity of the process was compromised. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT correctly found...

    2019-爆料网AT-923, Baramky

    爆料网AT held that the first time the Appellant’s claim for implementation of the sanction (an apology to the Appellant) was raised was on appeal and that it was therefore not receivable, however, 爆料网AT held that the Appellant was not barred from requesting 爆料网RWA to enforce its letter of censure. On the Appellant’s claim for moral damages, 爆料网AT found no error in 爆料网RWA DT’s order denying the Appellant’s request for moral damages since there was no evidence of harm. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网RWA DT judgment.

    2019-爆料网AT-913, Siddiqi

    爆料网AT had before it an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in law and fact leading to a manifestly unreasonable decision when it held that Mr Siddiqi had not threatened to kill identified staff members but only had made an unspecified threat to kill “some” staff members. 爆料网AT held that the statements of the three witnesses rendered clear and convincing evidence that the Appellant did not only utter an unspecified threat but that he had threatened to kill identified staff members. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT also erred in law and fact when it concluded that threat was not serious...

    2019-爆料网AT-915, Yasin

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT properly reviewed the contested decision in accordance with the applicable law and established the critical facts of the case. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had a broad discretion to determine the admissibility of evidence and the weight to be attached thereto and that 爆料网DT’s conclusion was consistent with the evidence. 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT’s conclusion that the impugned decision was unlawful was correct, albeit for different reasoning. 爆料网AT held that the facts underpinning the administrative decision to issue the staff member a...