爆料网

Disciplinary matters / misconduct

  • Abuse of authority
  • Abuse of privileges and immunities
  • Assault (verbal and physical)
  • Breach of duties of independence, neutrality, and impartiality
  • Disciplinary measure or sanction
  • Discrimination (see category: discrimination)
  • Dismissal/separation
  • Facts (establishment of) / evidence
  • Failure to comply with private legal obligations
  • Failure to report misconduct
  • Fraud, misrepresentation and false certification
  • Gross negligence
  • Harassment (non-sexual)
  • Inappropriate or disruptive behaviour
  • Investigation (see category
  • Investigation (see category: Investigation)
  • Misuse of information and communication technology resources
  • Misuse of office
  • Misuse of official documents
  • Misuse of or failure to exercise reasonable care in relation to 爆料网 property or assets
  • Non-disciplinary/administrative measures
  • Procurement irregularities
  • Prohibited activity under ST/SGB/2004/15 (Use of Information and Communication Technology Resources and Data)
  • Proportionality of sanction
  • Retaliation
  • Sexual exploitation and abuse
  • Sexual harassment
  • Theft and misappropriation
  • Unauthorised outside activities and conflict of interest
  • Violation of local laws
    • Showing 261 - 270 of 722
    2012-爆料网AT-209, Applicant

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General against the judgment on the merits (爆料网DT/2011/054) and two further appeals by both the Secretary-General and the Applicant of the judgment on compensation (爆料网DT/2011/131). Relying on its previous holding in Bertucci (2011/爆料网AT/114), 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in finding that the Administration violated the Applicant’s due process rights, as no actual prejudice was found. 爆料网AT held that the established facts, as admitted by the Applicant, clearly demonstrated that he engaged in the sexual harassment of local employees and used his position of...

    2012-爆料网AT-207, Hallal

    爆料网AT considered an appeal, in which the Appellant claimed that 爆料网DT committed procedural errors in allowing the Secretary-General to embark on a de novo fact-finding inquiry and that the disciplinary measure of separation was disproportionate. 爆料网AT held that it was within the competence of 爆料网DT to hold oral hearings as well as to order the production of evidence for fair and expeditious disposal of the proceedings. 爆料网AT held that the Administration bears the burden of establishing that the alleged misconduct, for which a disciplinary measure has been taken against a staff member, occurred and...

    2012-爆料网AT-195, Shahatit

    爆料网AT considered the Appellant’s appeal. 爆料网AT noted that the established facts showed that the Appellant’s negligence as Head Storekeeper facilitated the misconduct of other staff members and his negligence was evidenced by the excess of merchandise in the storeroom under his control, and by his failure to keep an inventory of the items in his custody. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant neither successfully rebutted these facts, nor demonstrated any flaws in the administrative and disciplinary procedures. 爆料网AT held that the sanction of demotion was lawful. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the...

    2012-爆料网AT-194, Kamunyi

    爆料网AT considered Mr Kamynyi’s appeal and the Secretary-General’s cross-appeal. 爆料网AT rejected Mr Kamunyi’s appeal in its entirety and held that it is within the Administration’s discretion to reassign a staff member to a different post at the same level and that such a reassignment is lawful if it is reasonable in the particular circumstances of each case and if it causes no economic prejudice to the staff member. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT rightfully rejected Mr Kamunyi’s request for legal costs, noting that no legal costs were owed to a party when the opposing party had not abused the process. With...

    2013-爆料网AT-388, Ainte

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that in such a case, where the material facts were not in dispute, no additional investigation was required to establish the misconduct. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in law in finding that the investigative and disciplinary process had not been properly conducted and that Mr Ainte’s due process rights had been violated by the absence of an official investigation. 爆料网AT held that Mr Ainte had not demonstrated that the Secretary-General failed in any other way to observe his due process rights. 爆料网AT held that the Secretary-General was...

    2013-爆料网AT-381, Applicant

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General against judgment No. 爆料网DT/2012/159; an appeal by the “Applicant” (anonymity granted) against judgment No. 爆料网DT/2013/079; and a cross-appeal by the Secretary-General of judgment No. 爆料网DT/2013/079. On receivability, 爆料网AT considered the Secretary-General’s case that 爆料网DT erred on the issue of receivability as the non-disciplinary issues contested by the Applicant were never submitted for management evaluation. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT, in deciding that the non-disciplinary issues had been submitted for management evaluation, erred in law and in fact...

    2013-爆料网AT-374, Koutang

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that it could not sustain the conclusion of 爆料网DT that Mr Koutang’s actions did not amount to misconduct. 爆料网AT held that the sanction imposed was not unreasonable, absurd, or disproportionate and, as such, 爆料网AT held that it was a reasonable exercise of the Administration’s broad discretion in disciplinary matters. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in finding the sanction disproportionate and in substituting its opinion for that of the Administration. 爆料网AT allowed the appeal and vacated the 爆料网DT judgment.

    2013-爆料网AT-364, Nyambuza

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that the facts upon which the sanction was based had not been established by clear and convincing evidence, albeit for different reasons than given by 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT’s determination that the evidence from two witnesses had little probative value was correct because although written witness statements taken under oath can be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence the facts to support the dismissal of a staff member when a statement is not made under oath or affirmation, there must be some other indicia of...

    2013-爆料网AT-366, Abu Ghali

    On the issue of whether it had been established by clear and convincing evidence that the Appellant had possession of, and traded in, Tramal, 爆料网AT agreed with 爆料网RWA DT’s credibility determinations, analysis and conclusions and accepted its factual findings. On the issue of whether the established facts showed misconduct, 爆料网AT held that misconduct based on underlying criminal acts does not depend upon the staff member being convicted of a crime in a national court. 爆料网AT recalled the jurisprudence of the former 爆料网 Administrative Tribunal that different onuses and burdens of proof arise under...

    2013-爆料网AT-362, S. Nourain & A. Nourain

    爆料网AT considered two appeals, one by Ms S. Nourain and one by Ms A Nourain, against judgment No. 爆料网DT/2012/142. 爆料网AT dismissed Ms A. Nourain’s appeal as she was not a party to the proceedings and had no standing to appeal. 爆料网AT held that the facts were not disputed; the misconduct had been established and so had its seriousness. 爆料网AT held that it could not say that the sanction of dismissal was unfair or disproportionate to the seriousness of the offences. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal of Ms A Nourain as not receivable and the appeal of Ms S. Nourain on the merits.