爆料网

Disciplinary matters / misconduct

  • Abuse of authority
  • Abuse of privileges and immunities
  • Assault (verbal and physical)
  • Breach of duties of independence, neutrality, and impartiality
  • Disciplinary measure or sanction
  • Discrimination (see category: discrimination)
  • Dismissal/separation
  • Facts (establishment of) / evidence
  • Failure to comply with private legal obligations
  • Failure to report misconduct
  • Fraud, misrepresentation and false certification
  • Gross negligence
  • Harassment (non-sexual)
  • Inappropriate or disruptive behaviour
  • Investigation (see category
  • Investigation (see category: Investigation)
  • Misuse of information and communication technology resources
  • Misuse of office
  • Misuse of official documents
  • Misuse of or failure to exercise reasonable care in relation to 爆料网 property or assets
  • Non-disciplinary/administrative measures
  • Procurement irregularities
  • Prohibited activity under ST/SGB/2004/15 (Use of Information and Communication Technology Resources and Data)
  • Proportionality of sanction
  • Retaliation
  • Sexual exploitation and abuse
  • Sexual harassment
  • Theft and misappropriation
  • Unauthorised outside activities and conflict of interest
  • Violation of local laws
    • Showing 221 - 230 of 722
    2022-爆料网AT-1259, Maguy Bamba

    爆料网AT held that the Appellant merely repeated arguments raised before 爆料网DT regarding the evidence. 爆料网AT accepted 爆料网DT’s finding that there was clear and convincing evidence to establish the facts underlying the allegations of misconduct. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT applied the appropriate legal standard, namely clear and convincing evidence. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT heard the evidence of the complainant, other material witnesses, assessed the credibility and reliability of the testimony under oath before it, determined the probable facts and then rendered a decision as to whether the onus to establish the...

    2022-爆料网AT-1231, Sergio Arvizu Trevino

    爆料网AT held that the Appellant had no standing to seek consideration by a full bench. 爆料网AT held that to the extent 爆料网DT engaged in a fact-finding exercise of its own, this was not a legitimate exercise of its competence. 爆料网AT held that the Administration’s failure to provide adequate reasons for the contested decision resulted in the contested decision being unlawful. 爆料网AT held that the Administration’s failure to exercise its discretion with regard to carrying out an investigation also rendered the contested decision unlawful. 爆料网AT allowed the appeal in part. 爆料网AT vacated the 爆料网DT Judgment by...

    2022-爆料网AT-1222, Ahmad Mudardas

    爆料网AT affirmed the 爆料网RWA DT Judgment. Regarding the deduction of a sum of money from his separation benefits, 爆料网AT agreed that this claim was not first submitted for decision review. Regarding his separation from service without termination indemnity, 爆料网AT also found no error in the 爆料网RWA DT Judgment. The Tribunal agreed with the 爆料网RWA DT that the bank statement did not contain the correct amount and that the invoices he submitted did not relate to genuine purchases. 爆料网AT was satisfied that: (i) the facts on which the disciplinary measure was based had been established by clear and convincing...

    2022-爆料网AT-1210, Appellant

    爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT erred both in not permitting the Appellant to call a witness (AA) and in the incorrect conclusions it drew from her hearsay evidence. 爆料网AT held that, to the extent that BB (a non-爆料网 staff member) was a witness adverse to the Appellant, the failure of the Secretary-General to secure her attendance before the 爆料网DT permitted an adverse inference which detracted considerably from the credibility and reliability of her allegations in the OIOS investigation report. 爆料网AT held that little weight could be attached to the evidence of two unidentified 爆料网 staff members, to whom the...

    2022-爆料网AT-1194, Jafar Hilmi Wakid

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT did not commit an error in procedure, such as to affect the decision of the case pursuant to Article 2(1) of the 爆料网AT Statute. 爆料网AT rejected the argument that the fact that the Appellant did not receive the recordings of the hearing or transcript affected the decision of the case. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant merely repeated arguments raised before 爆料网RWA DT. 爆料网AT accepted 爆料网RWA DT’s finding that the Appellant had ample opportunity to respond to allegations and provide comments on the investigation report and exhibits. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT made fundamental errors of...

    2022-爆料网AT-1216, Mujahid Zahoor

    The staff member’s main claim pertain to the proportionality of the disciplinary measure meted out to him, that is of summary dismissal. The Appeals Tribunal found no fault in the 爆料网DT conclusion that the staff member’s behavior toward the Complainant amounted to serious misconduct. The Tribunal noted (paras. 53 - 56): “… By sexually harassing her, the Appellant violated the applicable Regulations and Rules. He did not conduct himself in a manner befitting his status as an international civil servant. His actions not only violated the Complainant’s personal dignity but also adversely...

    爆料网DT/2022/041, Bwalya

    The Tribunal found that, as Country Director, in instructing the most junior staff member within the chain of command in the procurement process, to forge a document and by acting on that document through his endorsement and approval of the Formal Request which was misrepresented, the Applicant breached the Organization's cited rules and regulations. Additionally he violated paragraph 24(e) of the 爆料网DP Legal Framework, Section 3 of the 爆料网DP Policy on Fraud and other Corrupt Practices applicable at the time (爆料网DP Anti-Fraud Policy) and 爆料网DP’s Guidelines and Procedures on National Implementation...

    爆料网DT/2022/039, Iram

    The investigation successfully established that the Applicant engaged in workplace harassment in seven different occasions against the three complainants. By committing workplace harassment, the Applicant breached the highest standards of integrity and engaged in behaviour unbecoming of an international civil servant. As such, her conduct constitutes serious misconduct. However, the disciplinary measure of separation from service imposed on the Applicant was found to be too harsh of a penalty lin light of the Administration’s past disciplinary measures on other cases of comparable conduct, as...

    爆料网DT/2022/032, Kavosh

    The rationale for imposing such an extraordinary administrative measure in matters of ALWOP concerning sexual misconduct is twofold, firstly to act as a deterrent for staff members from engaging in sexual exploitation and abuse and secondly, to protect the interests of the Organization by upholding its integrity and reputation. Any decision to extend ALWOP must be reasonable and proportionate. A decision to extend ALWOP is a drastic administrative measure and normally should be of short duration. In determining whether an extension of ALWOP is lawful, the Tribunal shall be guided by factors...

    爆料网DT/2022/034, Kiriella

    Receivability ratione materiae. The Applicant’s management evaluation request was not clear on whether he was making allegations of misconduct against his Supervisor, which would need to be dutifully investigated, or citing performance or management issues to be addressed by management. Similarly, the Applicant did not provide any evidence that the matter of lawfulness of the decision to place him on ALWP was ever formally contested by him. Hence, any determination against the decision not to further investigate the Applicant’s complaints of harassment against his supervisor or against his...