爆料网DT/2013/034, Dunda
It is not disputed by either party that the Applicant was not employed by the Organization during the one week period between the curtailment, requested by himself, of his employment with 爆料网ECA and his appointment at 爆料网HQ. Furthermore, the Applicant “does not seek to challenge the 2005 decision creating the break in service, but, [in light of the Tribunal’s decision in Gomez], the later decision not to consider him eligible for conversion to permanent appointment on the basis of that earlier decision”. The Tribunal finds that the Applicant was ineligible for consideration for conversion to...