爆料网DT/2009/029, Gonzalez-Ruiz & Buscaglia
A summary judgment was rendered because, as per art. 9 of the RoP, there was no dispute as to the material facts and judgment was restricted to matters of law. As one of the Applicants did not file an application in person (art. 8.1 (b), 3.1 and 2.1 of 爆料网DT Statute) neither designated a counsel to act on his behalf (art. 12 of 爆料网DT RoP), his application was deemed as not receivable. Furthermore, considering that an apology is beyond the remedies which may be ordered by the Tribunal in accordance with art. 10.5 of 爆料网DT Statute, the application was declared as out of the Tribunal’s mandate.